[ValueTracking] Lower dom-conditions-dom-blocks and dom-conditions-max-uses thresholds
authorIgor Laevsky <igmyrj@gmail.com>
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:57:52 +0000 (14:57 +0000)
committerIgor Laevsky <igmyrj@gmail.com>
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:57:52 +0000 (14:57 +0000)
On some of our benchmarks this change shows about 50% compile time improvement without any noticeable performance difference.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13248

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp

index 285c945fc62df48d3293b6a1d9ee295f7df61111..b032b07f29ac6bd20c0a2c680c25a5dc89544300 100644 (file)
@@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> DomConditionsMaxDepth("dom-conditions-max-depth",
 /// conditions?
 static cl::opt<unsigned> DomConditionsMaxDomBlocks("dom-conditions-dom-blocks",
                                                    cl::Hidden,
-                                                   cl::init(20000));
+                                                   cl::init(20));
 
 // Controls the number of uses of the value searched for possible
 // dominating comparisons.
 static cl::opt<unsigned> DomConditionsMaxUses("dom-conditions-max-uses",
-                                              cl::Hidden, cl::init(2000));
+                                              cl::Hidden, cl::init(20));
 
 // If true, don't consider only compares whose only use is a branch.
 static cl::opt<bool> DomConditionsSingleCmpUse("dom-conditions-single-cmp-use",