replaced by this patch is equivalent to the new logic, but you'd be wrong, and
that's exactly where the bug was. There's a similar bug in instsimplify which
manifests itself as instsimplify failing to simplify this, rather than doing it
wrong, see next commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168181
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// Try not to increase register pressure.
BO0->hasOneUse() && BO1->hasOneUse()) {
// Determine Y and Z in the form icmp (X+Y), (X+Z).
- Value *Y = (A == C || A == D) ? B : A;
- Value *Z = (C == A || C == B) ? D : C;
+ Value *Y, *Z;
+ if (A == C) {
+ Y = B;
+ Z = D;
+ } else if (A == D) {
+ Y = B;
+ Z = C;
+ } else if (B == C) {
+ Y = A;
+ Z = D;
+ } else if (B == D) {
+ Y = A;
+ Z = C;
+ }
return new ICmpInst(Pred, Y, Z);
}
; CHECK-NEXT: %c = icmp eq i8 %1, %a
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %c
}
+
+define i1 @test65(i64 %A, i64 %B) {
+ %s1 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %s2 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %s1, %s2
+; CHECK: @test65
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
+ ret i1 %cmp
+}
+
+define i1 @test66(i64 %A, i64 %B) {
+ %s1 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %s2 = add i64 %B, %A
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %s1, %s2
+; CHECK: @test66
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
+ ret i1 %cmp
+}