[S390] cio: Correct use of ! and &
authorJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:33:16 +0000 (21:33 +0200)
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:33:54 +0000 (21:33 +0200)
In commit e6bafba5b4765a5a252f1b8d31cbf6d2459da337, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y).  The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way.  In particular,
the result of !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND is
always just !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw).

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
  !E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c

index 91ca87aa9f973902cbe148338709ddf53974c3fc..f49f0e502b8dfb7f144801db8aa57d975a2dc7b7 100644 (file)
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int chsc_examine_irb(struct chsc_request *request)
 {
        int backed_up;
 
-       if (!scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND)
+       if (!(scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
                return -EIO;
        backed_up = scsw_cstat(&request->irb.scsw) & SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;
        request->irb.scsw.cmd.cstat &= ~SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;