--- /dev/null
+; LoopSimplify is breaking LICM on this testcase because the exit blocks from
+; the loop are reachable from more than just the exit nodes: the exit blocks
+; have predecessors from outside of the loop!
+;
+; This is distilled from a monsterous crafty example.
+
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | lli
+
+%G = weak global int 0 ; <int*> [#uses=13]
+
+implementation ; Functions:
+
+int %main() {
+entry:
+ store int 123, int* %G
+ br label %loopentry.i
+
+loopentry.i: ; preds = %entry, %endif.1.i
+ %tmp.0.i = load int* %G ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.1.i = seteq int %tmp.0.i, 123 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
+ br bool %tmp.1.i, label %Out.i, label %endif.0.i
+
+endif.0.i: ; preds = %loopentry.i
+ %tmp.3.i = load int* %G ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.4.i = seteq int %tmp.3.i, 126 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
+ br bool %tmp.4.i, label %ExitBlock.i, label %endif.1.i
+
+endif.1.i: ; preds = %endif.0.i
+ %tmp.6.i = load int* %G ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ %inc.i = add int %tmp.6.i, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ store int %inc.i, int* %G
+ br label %loopentry.i
+
+Out.i: ; preds = %loopentry.i
+ store int 0, int* %G
+ br label %ExitBlock.i
+
+ExitBlock.i: ; preds = %endif.0.i, %Out.i
+ %tmp.7.i = load int* %G ; <int> [#uses=1]
+ ret int %tmp.7.i
+}
+