The blkvsc_mutex is unnecessary as the state it is protecting
(blkdev->users) is already protected by the spin lock.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
#include <linux/major.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/hdreg.h>
-#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <scsi/scsi.h>
#include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
int users;
};
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(blkvsc_mutex);
-
static const char *g_blk_driver_name = "blkvsc";
/* {32412632-86cb-44a2-9b5c-50d1417354f5} */
{
struct block_device_context *blkdev = disk->private_data;
- mutex_lock(&blkvsc_mutex);
spin_lock(&blkdev->lock);
if (blkdev->users == 1) {
spin_unlock(&blkdev->lock);
blkdev->users--;
spin_unlock(&blkdev->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&blkvsc_mutex);
return 0;
}