The idea is that rate = clk_round_rate(clk, r) is equivalent to:
clk_set_rate(clk, r);
rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
except that clk_round_rate() does not change the hardware in any way.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
* @clk: clock source
* @rate: desired clock rate in Hz
*
+ * This answers the question "if I were to pass @rate to clk_set_rate(),
+ * what clock rate would I end up with?" without changing the hardware
+ * in any way. In other words:
+ *
+ * rate = clk_round_rate(clk, r);
+ *
+ * and:
+ *
+ * clk_set_rate(clk, r);
+ * rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ *
+ * are equivalent except the former does not modify the clock hardware
+ * in any way.
+ *
* Returns rounded clock rate in Hz, or negative errno.
*/
long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);