iisUnmovableInstruction() had a list of instructions hardcoded which are
considered unmovable. The list lacked (at least) an entry for the va_arg
and cmpxchg instructions.
Fix this by introducing a new Instruction::mayBeMemoryDependent()
instead of maintaining another instruction list.
Patch by Matthias Braun <matze@braunis.de>.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11577
rdar://problem/
22118647
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@244244
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
const DominatorTree *DT = nullptr,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI = nullptr);
+ /// Returns true if the result or effects of the given instructions \p I
+ /// depend on or influence global memory.
+ /// Memory dependence arises for example if the the instruction reads from
+ /// memory or may produce effects or undefined behaviour. Memory dependent
+ /// instructions generally cannot be reorderd with respect to other memory
+ /// dependent instructions or moved into non-dominated basic blocks.
+ /// Instructions which just compute a value based on the values of their
+ /// operands are not memory dependent.
+ bool mayBeMemoryDependent(const Instruction &I);
+
/// isKnownNonNull - Return true if this pointer couldn't possibly be null by
/// its definition. This returns true for allocas, non-extern-weak globals
/// and byval arguments.
}
}
+bool llvm::mayBeMemoryDependent(const Instruction &I) {
+ return I.mayReadOrWriteMemory() || !isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(&I);
+}
+
/// Return true if we know that the specified value is never null.
bool llvm::isKnownNonNull(const Value *V, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
// Alloca never returns null, malloc might.
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
return nullptr;
}
-static bool isUnmovableInstruction(Instruction *I) {
- switch (I->getOpcode()) {
- case Instruction::PHI:
- case Instruction::LandingPad:
- case Instruction::Alloca:
- case Instruction::Load:
- case Instruction::Invoke:
- case Instruction::UDiv:
- case Instruction::SDiv:
- case Instruction::FDiv:
- case Instruction::URem:
- case Instruction::SRem:
- case Instruction::FRem:
- return true;
- case Instruction::Call:
- return !isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I);
- default:
- return false;
- }
-}
-
void Reassociate::BuildRankMap(Function &F) {
unsigned i = 2;
// we cannot move. This ensures that the ranks for these instructions are
// all different in the block.
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I)
- if (isUnmovableInstruction(I))
+ if (mayBeMemoryDependent(*I))
ValueRankMap[&*I] = ++BBRank;
}
}
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: opt -S -reassociate -die < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; The two va_arg instructions depend on the memory/context, are therfore not
+; identical and the sub should not be optimized to 0 by reassociate.
+;
+; CHECK-LABEL @func(
+; ...
+; CHECK: %v0 = va_arg i8** %varargs, i32
+; CHECK: %v1 = va_arg i8** %varargs, i32
+; CHECK: %v0.neg = sub i32 0, %v0
+; CHECK: %sub = add i32 %v0.neg, 1
+; CHECK: %add = add i32 %sub, %v1
+; ...
+; CHECK: ret i32 %add
+define i32 @func(i32 %dummy, ...) {
+ %varargs = alloca i8*, align 8
+ %varargs1 = bitcast i8** %varargs to i8*
+ call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %varargs1)
+ %v0 = va_arg i8** %varargs, i32
+ %v1 = va_arg i8** %varargs, i32
+ %sub = sub nsw i32 %v1, %v0
+ %add = add nsw i32 %sub, 1
+ call void @llvm.va_end(i8* %varargs1)
+ ret i32 %add
+}
+
+declare void @llvm.va_start(i8*)
+declare void @llvm.va_end(i8*)