From: Jim Grosbach Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:47:41 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Legalize vector truncates by parts rather than just splitting. X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0cb1019e9cd41237408eae09623eb9a34a4cbe0c;p=oota-llvm.git Legalize vector truncates by parts rather than just splitting. Rather than just splitting the input type and hoping for the best, apply a bit more cleverness. Just splitting the types until the source is legal often leads to an illegal result time, which is then widened and a scalarization step is introduced which leads to truly horrible code generation. With the loop vectorizer, these sorts of operations are much more common, and so it's worth extra effort to do them well. Add a legalization hook for the operands of a TRUNCATE node, which will be encountered after the result type has been legalized, but if the operand type is still illegal. If simple splitting of both types ends up with the result type of each half still being legal, just do that (v16i16 -> v16i8 on ARM, for example). If, however, that would result in an illegal result type (v8i32 -> v8i8 on ARM, for example), we can get more clever with power-two vectors. Specifically, split the input type, but also widen the result element size, then concatenate the halves and truncate again. For example on ARM, To perform a "%res = v8i8 trunc v8i32 %in" we transform to: %inlo = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 0 %inhi = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 4 %lo16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inlo %hi16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inhi %in16 = v8i16 concat_vectors v4i16 %lo16, v4i16 %hi16 %res = v8i8 trunc v8i16 %in16 This allows instruction selection to generate three VMOVN instructions instead of a sequences of moves, stores and loads. Update the ARMTargetTransformInfo to take this improved legalization into account. Consider the simplified IR: define <16 x i8> @test1(<16 x i32>* %ap) { %a = load <16 x i32>* %ap %tmp = trunc <16 x i32> %a to <16 x i8> ret <16 x i8> %tmp } define <8 x i8> @test2(<8 x i32>* %ap) { %a = load <8 x i32>* %ap %tmp = trunc <8 x i32> %a to <8 x i8> ret <8 x i8> %tmp } Previously, we would generate the truly hideous: .syntax unified .section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions .globl _test1 .align 2 _test1: @ @test1 @ BB#0: push {r7} mov r7, sp sub sp, sp, #20 bic sp, sp, #7 add r1, r0, #48 add r2, r0, #32 vld1.64 {d24, d25}, [r0:128] vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r1:128] vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r2:128] add r1, r0, #16 vmovn.i32 d22, q8 vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r1:128] vmovn.i32 d20, q9 vmovn.i32 d18, q12 vmov.u16 r0, d22[3] strb r0, [sp, #15] vmov.u16 r0, d22[2] strb r0, [sp, #14] vmov.u16 r0, d22[1] strb r0, [sp, #13] vmov.u16 r0, d22[0] vmovn.i32 d16, q8 strb r0, [sp, #12] vmov.u16 r0, d20[3] strb r0, [sp, #11] vmov.u16 r0, d20[2] strb r0, [sp, #10] vmov.u16 r0, d20[1] strb r0, [sp, #9] vmov.u16 r0, d20[0] strb r0, [sp, #8] vmov.u16 r0, d18[3] strb r0, [sp, #3] vmov.u16 r0, d18[2] strb r0, [sp, #2] vmov.u16 r0, d18[1] strb r0, [sp, #1] vmov.u16 r0, d18[0] strb r0, [sp] vmov.u16 r0, d16[3] strb r0, [sp, #7] vmov.u16 r0, d16[2] strb r0, [sp, #6] vmov.u16 r0, d16[1] strb r0, [sp, #5] vmov.u16 r0, d16[0] strb r0, [sp, #4] vldmia sp, {d16, d17} vmov r0, r1, d16 vmov r2, r3, d17 mov sp, r7 pop {r7} bx lr .globl _test2 .align 2 _test2: @ @test2 @ BB#0: push {r7} mov r7, sp sub sp, sp, #12 bic sp, sp, #7 vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r0:128] add r0, r0, #16 vld1.64 {d20, d21}, [r0:128] vmovn.i32 d18, q8 vmov.u16 r0, d18[3] vmovn.i32 d16, q10 strb r0, [sp, #3] vmov.u16 r0, d18[2] strb r0, [sp, #2] vmov.u16 r0, d18[1] strb r0, [sp, #1] vmov.u16 r0, d18[0] strb r0, [sp] vmov.u16 r0, d16[3] strb r0, [sp, #7] vmov.u16 r0, d16[2] strb r0, [sp, #6] vmov.u16 r0, d16[1] strb r0, [sp, #5] vmov.u16 r0, d16[0] strb r0, [sp, #4] ldm sp, {r0, r1} mov sp, r7 pop {r7} bx lr Now, however, we generate the much more straightforward: .syntax unified .section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions .globl _test1 .align 2 _test1: @ @test1 @ BB#0: add r1, r0, #48 add r2, r0, #32 vld1.64 {d20, d21}, [r0:128] vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r1:128] add r1, r0, #16 vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r2:128] vld1.64 {d22, d23}, [r1:128] vmovn.i32 d17, q8 vmovn.i32 d16, q9 vmovn.i32 d18, q10 vmovn.i32 d19, q11 vmovn.i16 d17, q8 vmovn.i16 d16, q9 vmov r0, r1, d16 vmov r2, r3, d17 bx lr .globl _test2 .align 2 _test2: @ @test2 @ BB#0: vld1.64 {d16, d17}, [r0:128] add r0, r0, #16 vld1.64 {d18, d19}, [r0:128] vmovn.i32 d16, q8 vmovn.i32 d17, q9 vmovn.i16 d16, q8 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.h b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.h index adc0e9d86e5..1c4274a9108 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.h +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.h @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ private: SDValue SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N); SDValue SplitVecOp_STORE(StoreSDNode *N, unsigned OpNo); SDValue SplitVecOp_CONCAT_VECTORS(SDNode *N); + SDValue SplitVecOp_TRUNCATE(SDNode *N); SDValue SplitVecOp_VSETCC(SDNode *N); SDValue SplitVecOp_FP_ROUND(SDNode *N); diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp index bd8b6ac0c7d..04c6bfd0c23 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp @@ -1046,6 +1046,7 @@ bool DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVectorOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { case ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR: Res = SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR(N); break; case ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT:Res = SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(N); break; case ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS: Res = SplitVecOp_CONCAT_VECTORS(N); break; + case ISD::TRUNCATE: Res = SplitVecOp_TRUNCATE(N); break; case ISD::FP_ROUND: Res = SplitVecOp_FP_ROUND(N); break; case ISD::STORE: Res = SplitVecOp_STORE(cast(N), OpNo); @@ -1062,7 +1063,6 @@ bool DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVectorOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { case ISD::SINT_TO_FP: case ISD::UINT_TO_FP: case ISD::FTRUNC: - case ISD::TRUNCATE: case ISD::SIGN_EXTEND: case ISD::ZERO_EXTEND: case ISD::ANY_EXTEND: @@ -1293,6 +1293,66 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_CONCAT_VECTORS(SDNode *N) { &Elts[0], Elts.size()); } +SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_TRUNCATE(SDNode *N) { + // The result type is legal, but the input type is illegal. If splitting + // ends up with the result type of each half still being legal, just + // do that. If, however, that would result in an illegal result type, + // we can try to get more clever with power-two vectors. Specifically, + // split the input type, but also widen the result element size, then + // concatenate the halves and truncate again. For example, consider a target + // where v8i8 is legal and v8i32 is not (ARM, which doesn't have 256-bit + // vectors). To perform a "%res = v8i8 trunc v8i32 %in" we do: + // %inlo = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 0 + // %inhi = v4i32 extract_subvector %in, 4 + // %lo16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inlo + // %hi16 = v4i16 trunc v4i32 %inhi + // %in16 = v8i16 concat_vectors v4i16 %lo16, v4i16 %hi16 + // %res = v8i8 trunc v8i16 %in16 + // + // Without this transform, the original truncate would end up being + // scalarized, which is pretty much always a last resort. + SDValue InVec = N->getOperand(0); + EVT InVT = InVec->getValueType(0); + EVT OutVT = N->getValueType(0); + unsigned NumElements = OutVT.getVectorNumElements(); + // Widening should have already made sure this is a power-two vector + // if we're trying to split it at all. assert() that's true, just in case. + assert(!(NumElements & 1) && "Splitting vector, but not in half!"); + + unsigned InElementSize = InVT.getVectorElementType().getSizeInBits(); + unsigned OutElementSize = OutVT.getVectorElementType().getSizeInBits(); + + // If the input elements are only 1/2 the width of the result elements, + // just use the normal splitting. Our trick only work if there's room + // to split more than once. + if (InElementSize <= OutElementSize * 2) + return SplitVecOp_UnaryOp(N); + DebugLoc DL = N->getDebugLoc(); + + // Extract the halves of the input via extract_subvector. + EVT SplitVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), + InVT.getVectorElementType(), NumElements/2); + SDValue InLoVec = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, DL, SplitVT, InVec, + DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0)); + SDValue InHiVec = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, DL, SplitVT, InVec, + DAG.getIntPtrConstant(NumElements/2)); + // Truncate them to 1/2 the element size. + EVT HalfElementVT = EVT::getIntegerVT(*DAG.getContext(), InElementSize/2); + EVT HalfVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), HalfElementVT, + NumElements/2); + SDValue HalfLo = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, HalfVT, InLoVec); + SDValue HalfHi = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, HalfVT, InHiVec); + // Concatenate them to get the full intermediate truncation result. + EVT InterVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), HalfElementVT, NumElements); + SDValue InterVec = DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, InterVT, HalfLo, + HalfHi); + // Now finish up by truncating all the way down to the original result + // type. This should normally be something that ends up being legal directly, + // but in theory if a target has very wide vectors and an annoyingly + // restricted set of legal types, this split can chain to build things up. + return DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, OutVT, InterVec); +} + SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecOp_VSETCC(SDNode *N) { assert(N->getValueType(0).isVector() && N->getOperand(0).getValueType().isVector() && diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMTargetTransformInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMTargetTransformInfo.cpp index 1019b972e95..3149f19b787 100644 --- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMTargetTransformInfo.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMTargetTransformInfo.cpp @@ -223,9 +223,9 @@ unsigned ARMTTI::getCastInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Dst, { ISD::SIGN_EXTEND, MVT::v16i32, MVT::v16i8, 6 }, { ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, MVT::v16i32, MVT::v16i8, 6 }, - // Operations that we legalize using load/stores to the stack. - { ISD::TRUNCATE, MVT::v16i8, MVT::v16i32, 4*1 + 16*2 + 2*1 }, - { ISD::TRUNCATE, MVT::v8i8, MVT::v8i32, 2*1 + 8*2 + 1 }, + // Operations that we legalize using splitting. + { ISD::TRUNCATE, MVT::v16i8, MVT::v16i32, 6 }, + { ISD::TRUNCATE, MVT::v8i8, MVT::v8i32, 3 }, // Vector float <-> i32 conversions. { ISD::SINT_TO_FP, MVT::v4f32, MVT::v4i32, 1 }, diff --git a/test/Analysis/CostModel/ARM/cast.ll b/test/Analysis/CostModel/ARM/cast.ll index ba9d84cf3e2..0cdd61cac4f 100644 --- a/test/Analysis/CostModel/ARM/cast.ll +++ b/test/Analysis/CostModel/ARM/cast.ll @@ -175,9 +175,9 @@ define i32 @casts() { %rext_5 = zext <4 x i16> undef to <4 x i64> ; Vector cast cost of instructions lowering the cast to the stack. - ; CHECK: cost of 19 {{.*}} trunc + ; CHECK: cost of 3 {{.*}} trunc %r74 = trunc <8 x i32> undef to <8 x i8> - ; CHECK: cost of 38 {{.*}} trunc + ; CHECK: cost of 6 {{.*}} trunc %r75 = trunc <16 x i32> undef to <16 x i8> ; Floating point truncation costs. diff --git a/test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt-cost.ll b/test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt-cost.ll index 04619b9c6cf..0d45c40b881 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt-cost.ll +++ b/test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt-cost.ll @@ -32,29 +32,22 @@ define void @func_cvt1(%TA0_5* %loadaddr, %TA1_5* %storeaddr) { store %TA1_5 %r, %TA1_5* %storeaddr ret void } -;; We currently estimate the cost of this instruction as expensive. If lowering -;; is improved the cost needs to change. + %T0_51 = type <8 x i32> %T1_51 = type <8 x i8> ; CHECK: func_cvt51: define void @func_cvt51(%T0_51* %loadaddr, %T1_51* %storeaddr) { -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i16 %v0 = load %T0_51* %loadaddr ; COST: func_cvt51 -; COST: cost of 19 {{.*}} trunc +; COST: cost of 3 {{.*}} trunc %r = trunc %T0_51 %v0 to %T1_51 store %T1_51 %r, %T1_51* %storeaddr ret void } -;; We currently estimate the cost of this instruction as expensive. If lowering -;; is improved the cost needs to change. + %TT0_5 = type <16 x i8> %TT1_5 = type <16 x i32> ; CHECK: func_cvt52: @@ -87,31 +80,20 @@ define void @func_cvt12(%TTA0_5* %loadaddr, %TTA1_5* %storeaddr) { store %TTA1_5 %r, %TTA1_5* %storeaddr ret void } -;; We currently estimate the cost of this instruction as expensive. If lowering -;; is improved the cost needs to change. + %TT0_51 = type <16 x i32> %TT1_51 = type <16 x i8> ; CHECK: func_cvt512: define void @func_cvt512(%TT0_51* %loadaddr, %TT1_51* %storeaddr) { -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb -; CHECK: strb +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i32 +; CHECK: vmovn.i16 +; CHECK: vmovn.i16 %v0 = load %TT0_51* %loadaddr ; COST: func_cvt512 -; COST: cost of 38 {{.*}} trunc +; COST: cost of 6 {{.*}} trunc %r = trunc %TT0_51 %v0 to %TT1_51 store %TT1_51 %r, %TT1_51* %storeaddr ret void