From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 01:51:32 +0000 (+0930) Subject: s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET. X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~176^2~5434^2~11 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=228b82211b47b597fa75dff2ac146b40eaaddf18;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET. Saves repeating "(void __force *)__uptr" but it's less clear. Using the output of PTR_RET() to determine the error rather than just testing IS_ERR() is odd. For example, I *assume* __gptr_to_uptr() never returns NULL? Because the __ret would be 0 for the old code. The new version is clearer, IMHO: it would try to get_user() on that address. If you hate this variant, I can just s/PTR_RET/PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO/ instead. Cc: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell Acked-by: Heiko Carstens --- diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h index 302e0e52b009..99d789e8a018 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ static inline void __user *__gptr_to_uptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ({ \ __typeof__(gptr) __uptr = __gptr_to_uptr(vcpu, gptr, 1);\ int __mask = sizeof(__typeof__(*(gptr))) - 1; \ - int __ret = PTR_RET((void __force *)__uptr); \ + int __ret; \ \ - if (!__ret) { \ + if (IS_ERR((void __force *)__uptr)) { \ + __ret = PTR_ERR((void __force *)__uptr); \ + } else { \ BUG_ON((unsigned long)__uptr & __mask); \ __ret = get_user(x, __uptr); \ } \ @@ -55,9 +57,11 @@ static inline void __user *__gptr_to_uptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ({ \ __typeof__(gptr) __uptr = __gptr_to_uptr(vcpu, gptr, 1);\ int __mask = sizeof(__typeof__(*(gptr))) - 1; \ - int __ret = PTR_RET((void __force *)__uptr); \ + int __ret; \ \ - if (!__ret) { \ + if (IS_ERR((void __force *)__uptr)) { \ + __ret = PTR_ERR((void __force *)__uptr); \ + } else { \ BUG_ON((unsigned long)__uptr & __mask); \ __ret = put_user(x, __uptr); \ } \