From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:17:12 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: I believe that the code generator now properly handles dead basic blocks.  If not,
X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=23a53aa9c4317a728cd185e8e803d7c7d9da5456;p=oota-llvm.git

I believe that the code generator now properly handles dead basic blocks.  If not,
this is a bug, and should be fixed.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@14476 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index 194c8b5e6ed..f1f003ba074 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ bool X86TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitAssembly(PassManager &PM,
   // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions!
   PM.add(createLowerInvokePass());
 
-  // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with
-  // unreachable basic blocks.
-  PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
-
   // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector!
   PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass());
 
@@ -126,10 +122,6 @@ void X86JITInfo::addPassesToJITCompile(FunctionPassManager &PM) {
   // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions!
   PM.add(createLowerInvokePass());
 
-  // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with
-  // unreachable basic blocks.
-  PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
-
   // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector!
   PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass());