From: Viresh Kumar Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 04:12:04 +0000 (+0530) Subject: thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_dev_list instead of cpufreq_dev_count X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~176^2~2586^2^2~1^2~12 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2479bb6443d6a793f896219a34bfab0cc410f0b4;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_dev_list instead of cpufreq_dev_count As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of a local counter. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index d2e6f845fe7d..32ff6dc5efee 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -71,8 +71,6 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { static DEFINE_IDR(cpufreq_idr); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cooling_cpufreq_lock); -static unsigned int cpufreq_dev_count; - static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_dev_list); /** @@ -419,10 +417,9 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); /* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */ - if (cpufreq_dev_count == 0) + if (list_empty(&cpufreq_dev_list)) cpufreq_register_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); - cpufreq_dev_count++; list_add(&cpufreq_dev->node, &cpufreq_dev_list); mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); @@ -495,10 +492,9 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) cpufreq_dev = cdev->devdata; mutex_lock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock); list_del(&cpufreq_dev->node); - cpufreq_dev_count--; /* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */ - if (cpufreq_dev_count == 0) + if (list_empty(&cpufreq_dev_list)) cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); mutex_unlock(&cooling_cpufreq_lock);