From: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:58:13 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: I don't think it makes any sense to assert that the target supports SSE3 here.
X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=38169788fa26464353f0010f66f8b933c3d8c4bc;p=oota-llvm.git

I don't think it makes any sense to assert that the target supports SSE3 here.
The user (i.e. whoever generated a call to the intrinsic in the first place) is
essentially asking for a particular instruction to be placed in the assembler.
If that instruction won't execute on the target machine, that's their problem
not ours.  Two buildbots with processors that don't support SSE3 were barfing
on the apm.ll test in CodeGen/X86 because of this assertion.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 2bff139228f..07bd5cf5b86 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -9459,8 +9459,6 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitPCMP(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB,
 
 MachineBasicBlock *
 X86TargetLowering::EmitMonitor(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
-  assert(Subtarget->hasSSE3() && "Target must have SSE3 features enabled");
-  
   DebugLoc dl = MI->getDebugLoc();
   const TargetInstrInfo *TII = getTargetMachine().getInstrInfo();
   
@@ -9486,8 +9484,6 @@ X86TargetLowering::EmitMonitor(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
 
 MachineBasicBlock *
 X86TargetLowering::EmitMwait(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
-  assert(Subtarget->hasSSE3() && "Target must have SSE3 features enabled");
-  
   DebugLoc dl = MI->getDebugLoc();
   const TargetInstrInfo *TII = getTargetMachine().getInstrInfo();