From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:11:13 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Apparently, it is possible for a block with a landing pad successor to have no calls. X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=45e53975f81164d6e5e6322e83dd19030b7d3c88;p=oota-llvm.git Apparently, it is possible for a block with a landing pad successor to have no calls. In that case we simply ignore the landing pad and split live ranges before the first terminator. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp index 32c553ff12d..e769df5b76d 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ LiveIntervals::getLastSplitPoint(const LiveInterval &li, if (I->getDesc().isCall()) return I; } - assert(0 && "Block with landing pad successor contains no call instruction"); + // The block contains no calls that can throw, so use the first terminator. return mbb->getFirstTerminator(); }