From: Michael Liao Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:20:36 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Move scalar immediate shift lowering into a dedicated func X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b7ab12d93f5677d7ee8d4f6955bcfe52c22daca;p=oota-llvm.git Move scalar immediate shift lowering into a dedicated func - no functionality change git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177476 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp index 5c2f6517eeb..71288c9f04c 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp @@ -11491,16 +11491,13 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const { return SDValue(); } -SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerShift(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const { - +static SDValue LowerScalarImmediateShift(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, + const X86Subtarget *Subtarget) { EVT VT = Op.getValueType(); DebugLoc dl = Op.getDebugLoc(); SDValue R = Op.getOperand(0); SDValue Amt = Op.getOperand(1); - if (!Subtarget->hasSSE2()) - return SDValue(); - // Optimize shl/srl/sra with constant shift amount. if (isSplatVector(Amt.getNode())) { SDValue SclrAmt = Amt->getOperand(0); @@ -11611,6 +11608,24 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerShift(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const { } } + return SDValue(); +} + +SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerShift(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const { + + EVT VT = Op.getValueType(); + DebugLoc dl = Op.getDebugLoc(); + SDValue R = Op.getOperand(0); + SDValue Amt = Op.getOperand(1); + SDValue V; + + if (!Subtarget->hasSSE2()) + return SDValue(); + + V = LowerScalarImmediateShift(Op, DAG, Subtarget); + if (V.getNode()) + return V; + // Lower SHL with variable shift amount. if (VT == MVT::v4i32 && Op->getOpcode() == ISD::SHL) { Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, VT, Amt, DAG.getConstant(23, VT));