From: Devang Patel Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 21:57:00 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Scanning entire basic block may be too expensive in terms of compile time. Instead... X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=67352b3ce7110541475ed7fb335ee95954f0523a;p=oota-llvm.git Scanning entire basic block may be too expensive in terms of compile time. Instead, just use whatever location info first non-phi instruction has. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp index c705cc51094..92464e8cf13 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp @@ -542,11 +542,9 @@ ReturnInst *llvm::FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch(ReturnInst *RI, BasicBlock *BB, /// GetFirstDebugLocInBasicBlock - Return first valid DebugLoc entry in a /// given basic block. DebugLoc llvm::GetFirstDebugLocInBasicBlock(const BasicBlock *BB) { - for (BasicBlock::const_iterator BI = BB->begin(), BE = BB->end(); - BI != BE; ++BI) { - DebugLoc DL = BI->getDebugLoc(); - if (!DL.isUnknown()) - return DL; - } + if (const Instruction *I = BB->getFirstNonPHI()) + return I->getDebugLoc(); + // Scanning entire block may be too expensive, if the first instruction + // does not have valid location info. return DebugLoc(); }