From: U. Artie Eoff Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:49:32 +0000 (-0700) Subject: drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~176^2~2980^2~3^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=673e7bbdb3920b62cfc6c710bea626b0a9b0f43a;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA Improper truncated integer division in the scale() function causes actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial) work-around should be sufficient for a majority of use-cases, but it is by no means a complete solution. TODO: Determine how best to scale "user" values to "hw" values, and vice-versa, when the ranges are of different sizes. That would be a buggy scenario even with this work-around. The issue was introduced in the following (v3.17-rc1) commit: 6dda730 drm/i915: respect the VBT minimum backlight brightness Note that for easier backporting this commit adds a duplicated macro. A follow-up cleanup patch rectifies this for 3.18+ v2: (thanks to Chris Wilson) clarify commit message, use rounded division macro v3: -DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() fails to build with CONFIG_X86_32=y. (Jani) -Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead. (Damien) -v1 and v2 originally authored by Joe Konno. Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-By: Joe Konno [danvet: Add backporting note.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c index 18784470a760..97ff71f40dd3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ intel_panel_detect(struct drm_device *dev) } } +#define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ll, d) \ +({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)/2; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; }) + /** * scale - scale values from one range to another * @@ -419,9 +422,8 @@ static uint32_t scale(uint32_t source_val, source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max); /* avoid overflows */ - target_val = (uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) * - (target_max - target_min); - do_div(target_val, source_max - source_min); + target_val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) * + (target_max - target_min), source_max - source_min); target_val += target_min; return target_val;