From: Daniel Vetter Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:55:31 +0000 (+0200) Subject: drm/via: track user->memblock mapping with idr X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~3680^2~3773^2~50^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=77ee8f3825054f23b17e9c8f728f061defd86cdc;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git drm/via: track user->memblock mapping with idr Massive indirection through a hashtable for a simple key->pointer look-up actually just adds bloat. v2: Drop the misleading comment noted by Chris Wilson. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_drv.h index 9cf87d912325..108ea71f399d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_drv.h @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ typedef struct drm_via_private { struct drm_sman sman; int vram_initialized; int agp_initialized; + /** Mapping of userspace keys to mm objects */ + struct idr object_idr; unsigned long vram_offset; unsigned long agp_offset; drm_via_blitq_t blit_queues[VIA_NUM_BLIT_ENGINES]; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_map.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_map.c index 6cca9a709f7a..b09f6596f15f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_map.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_map.c @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ int via_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long chipset) dev_priv->chipset = chipset; + idr_init(&dev->object_name_idr); ret = drm_sman_init(&dev_priv->sman, 2, 12, 8); if (ret) { kfree(dev_priv); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c index e0110bc27606..e6f2b6371b4e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int via_mem_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file) { drm_via_mem_t *mem = data; - int retval = 0; + int retval = 0, user_key; struct drm_memblock_item *item; drm_via_private_t *dev_priv = (drm_via_private_t *) dev->dev_private; struct via_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv; @@ -139,23 +139,44 @@ int via_mem_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, tmpSize = (mem->size + VIA_MM_ALIGN_MASK) >> VIA_MM_ALIGN_SHIFT; item = drm_sman_alloc(&dev_priv->sman, mem->type, tmpSize, 0, 0); + if (!item) { + retval = -ENOMEM; + goto fail_alloc; + } - if (item) { - list_add(&item->owner_list, &file_priv->obj_list); - mem->offset = ((mem->type == VIA_MEM_VIDEO) ? - dev_priv->vram_offset : dev_priv->agp_offset) + - (item->mm-> - offset(item->mm, item->mm_info) << VIA_MM_ALIGN_SHIFT); - mem->index = item->user_hash.key; - } else { - mem->offset = 0; - mem->size = 0; - mem->index = 0; - DRM_DEBUG("Video memory allocation failed\n"); +again: + if (idr_pre_get(&dev_priv->object_idr, GFP_KERNEL) == 0) { retval = -ENOMEM; + goto fail_idr; } + + retval = idr_get_new_above(&dev_priv->object_idr, item, 1, &user_key); + if (retval == -EAGAIN) + goto again; + if (retval) + goto fail_idr; + + list_add(&item->owner_list, &file_priv->obj_list); mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); + mem->offset = ((mem->type == VIA_MEM_VIDEO) ? + dev_priv->vram_offset : dev_priv->agp_offset) + + (item->mm-> + offset(item->mm, item->mm_info) << VIA_MM_ALIGN_SHIFT); + mem->index = user_key; + + return 0; + +fail_idr: + drm_sman_free(item); +fail_alloc: + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); + + mem->offset = 0; + mem->size = 0; + mem->index = 0; + DRM_DEBUG("Video memory allocation failed\n"); + return retval; } @@ -163,11 +184,20 @@ int via_mem_free(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) { drm_via_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; drm_via_mem_t *mem = data; + struct drm_memblock_item *obj; int ret; mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); - ret = drm_sman_free_key(&dev_priv->sman, mem->index); + obj = idr_find(&dev_priv->object_idr, mem->index); + if (obj == NULL) { + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); + return -EINVAL; + } + + idr_remove(&dev_priv->object_idr, mem->index); + drm_sman_free(obj); mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); + DRM_DEBUG("free = 0x%lx\n", mem->index); return ret;