From: David Majnemer Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:49:57 +0000 (+0000) Subject: InstSimplify: The upper bound of X / C was missing a rounding step X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7ceba3a1b0c9f3697740cbcbccc398927da055dc;p=oota-llvm.git InstSimplify: The upper bound of X / C was missing a rounding step Summary: When calculating the upper bound of X / -8589934592, we would perform the following calculation: Floor[INT_MAX / 8589934592] However, flooring the result would make us wrongly come to the conclusion that 1073741824 was not in the set of possible values. Instead, use the ceiling of the result. Reviewers: nicholas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4502 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212976 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp index bd42af15da3..1054c7935b5 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp @@ -1964,7 +1964,15 @@ static Value *SimplifyICmpInst(unsigned Predicate, Value *LHS, Value *RHS, APInt Val = CI2->getValue().abs(); if (!Val.isMinValue()) { Lower = IntMin.sdiv(Val); - Upper = IntMax.sdiv(Val) + 1; + APInt Rem; + APInt::sdivrem(IntMax, Val, Upper, Rem); + // We may need to round the result of the INT_MAX / CI2 calculation up + // if we see that the division was not exact. + if (Rem.isMinValue()) + Upper = Upper + 1; + else + Upper = Upper + 2; + assert(Upper != Lower && "Upper part of range has wrapped!"); } } else if (match(LHS, m_LShr(m_Value(), m_ConstantInt(CI2)))) { // 'lshr x, CI2' produces [0, UINT_MAX >> CI2]. diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/compare.ll b/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/compare.ll index 7d0cd9c5878..d329b7b719f 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/compare.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/compare.ll @@ -913,3 +913,14 @@ define i1 @icmp_sdiv_int_min(i32 %a) { ; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[DIV]], -1073741824 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]] } + +define i1 @icmp_sdiv_pr20288(i64 %a) { + %div = sdiv i64 %a, -8589934592 + %cmp = icmp ne i64 %div, 1073741824 + ret i1 %cmp + +; CHECK-LABEL: @icmp_sdiv_pr20288 +; CHECK-NEXT: [[DIV:%.*]] = sdiv i64 %a, -8589934592 +; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ne i64 [[DIV]], 1073741824 +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP]] +}