From: Stephen Lin Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:42:25 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Add more tests for r179925 to verify correct handling of signext/zeroext; strengthen... X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81fef0267b6971b32a618a655d91f472cedfcaf2;p=oota-llvm.git Add more tests for r179925 to verify correct handling of signext/zeroext; strengthen condition check to require actual MVT::i32 virtual register types, just in case (no actual functionality change) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180138 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp index 8658e975e3f..46af4571a06 100644 --- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp @@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ ARMTargetLowering::LowerCallResult(SDValue Chain, SDValue InFlag, // Pass 'this' value directly from the argument to return value, to avoid // reg unit interference if (i == 0 && isThisReturn) { - assert(!VA.needsCustom() && VA.getLocVT() == MVT::i32); + assert(!VA.needsCustom() && VA.getLocVT() == MVT::i32 && + "unexpected return calling convention register assignment"); InVals.push_back(ThisVal); continue; } @@ -1466,8 +1467,10 @@ ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall(TargetLowering::CallLoweringInfo &CLI, StackPtr, MemOpChains, Flags); } } else if (VA.isRegLoc()) { - if (realArgIdx == 0 && Flags.isReturned() && VA.getLocVT() == MVT::i32) { - assert(!Ins.empty() && Ins[0].VT == Outs[0].VT && + if (realArgIdx == 0 && Flags.isReturned() && Outs[0].VT == MVT::i32) { + assert(VA.getLocVT() == MVT::i32 && + "unexpected calling convention register assignment"); + assert(!Ins.empty() && Ins[0].VT == MVT::i32 && "unexpected use of 'returned'"); isThisReturn = true; } diff --git a/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll b/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll index f06e4a4f8dd..3047302ea75 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll +++ b/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll @@ -103,3 +103,67 @@ entry: %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_complete(%struct.B* %b2, i32 %x) ret %struct.E* %this } + +declare i16 @identity16(i16 returned %x) +declare zeroext i16 @zeroext16(i16 returned %x) +declare i32 @identity32(i32 returned %x) + +define i16 @test_identity(i16 %x) { +entry: +; CHECKELF: test_identity: +; CHECKELF: mov [[SAVEX:r[0-9]+]], r0 +; CHECKELF: bl identity16 +; CHECKELF: uxth r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKELF: bl identity32 +; CHECKELF: mov r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKT2D: test_identity: +; CHECKT2D: mov [[SAVEX:r[0-9]+]], r0 +; CHECKT2D: blx _identity16 +; CHECKT2D: uxth r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKT2D: blx _identity32 +; CHECKT2D: mov r0, [[SAVEX]] + %call = tail call i16 @identity16(i16 %x) + %b = zext i16 %x to i32 + %call2 = tail call i32 @identity32(i32 %b) + ret i16 %call +} + +define i16 @test_matched_ext(i16 %x) { +entry: +; CHECKELF: test_matched_ext: +; CHECKELF-NOT: mov {{r[0-9]+}}, r0 +; CHECKELF: bl zeroext16 +; CHECKELF-NOT: uxth r0, {{r[0-9]+}} +; CHECKELF: bl identity32 +; CHECKELF-NOT: mov r0, {{r[0-9]+}} +; CHECKT2D: test_matched_ext: +; CHECKT2D-NOT: mov {{r[0-9]+}}, r0 +; CHECKT2D: blx _zeroext16 +; CHECKT2D-NOT: uxth r0, {{r[0-9]+}} +; CHECKT2D: blx _identity32 +; CHECKT2D-NOT: mov r0, {{r[0-9]+}} + %call = tail call i16 @zeroext16(i16 %x) + %b = zext i16 %call to i32 + %call2 = tail call i32 @identity32(i32 %b) + ret i16 %call +} + +define i16 @test_mismatched_ext(i16 %x) { +entry: +; CHECKELF: test_mismatched_ext: +; CHECKELF: mov [[SAVEX:r[0-9]+]], r0 +; CHECKELF: bl zeroext16 +; CHECKELF: sxth r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKELF: bl identity32 +; CHECKELF: mov r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKT2D: test_mismatched_ext: +; CHECKT2D: mov [[SAVEX:r[0-9]+]], r0 +; CHECKT2D: blx _zeroext16 +; CHECKT2D: sxth r0, [[SAVEX]] +; CHECKT2D: blx _identity32 +; CHECKT2D: mov r0, [[SAVEX]] + %call = tail call i16 @zeroext16(i16 %x) + %b = sext i16 %call to i32 + %call2 = tail call i32 @identity32(i32 %b) + ret i16 %call +}