From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:59:53 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Be more precise about verifying missing kill flags. X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=962c71089d5c725784135146177736c43d550813;p=oota-llvm.git Be more precise about verifying missing kill flags. It is legal for an instruction to have two operands using the same register, only one a kill. This is interpreted as a kill. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp index 68688cacabe..8ada60a5533 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp @@ -624,12 +624,14 @@ MachineVerifier::visitMachineOperand(const MachineOperand *MO, unsigned MONum) { } // Verify isKill == LI.killedAt. if (!MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(MONum)) { + // MI could kill register without a kill flag on MO. + bool miKill = MI->killsRegister(Reg); bool liKill = LI.killedAt(UseIdx.getDefIndex()); - if (isKill && !liKill) { + if (miKill && !liKill) { report("Live range continues after kill flag", MO, MONum); *OS << "Live range: " << LI << '\n'; } - if (!isKill && liKill) { + if (!miKill && liKill) { report("Live range ends without kill flag", MO, MONum); *OS << "Live range: " << LI << '\n'; }