From: Chris Lattner Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:05:20 +0000 (+0000) Subject: teach DSE to use GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset to analyze X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a04096580a65b6cfbe12dabf6d695f7303750c0d;p=oota-llvm.git teach DSE to use GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset to analyze may-aliasing stores that partially overlap with different base pointers. This implements PR6043 and the non-variable part of PR8657 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120485 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h index b95749f5eda..953d9106ed6 100644 --- a/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h +++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h @@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ namespace llvm { /// base and offset to the caller. Value *GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(Value *Ptr, int64_t &Offset, const TargetData &TD); + static inline const Value * + GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(const Value *Ptr, int64_t &Offset, + const TargetData &TD) { + return GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(const_cast(Ptr), Offset,TD); + } /// GetConstantStringInfo - This function computes the length of a /// null-terminated C string pointed to by V. If successful, it returns true diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp index da107134718..78004595ece 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryDependenceAnalysis.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" #include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h" using namespace llvm; @@ -260,28 +261,60 @@ static uint64_t getPointerSize(Value *V, AliasAnalysis &AA) { static bool isCompleteOverwrite(const AliasAnalysis::Location &Later, const AliasAnalysis::Location &Earlier, AliasAnalysis &AA) { - const Value *P1 = Later.Ptr->stripPointerCasts(); - const Value *P2 = Earlier.Ptr->stripPointerCasts(); + const Value *P1 = Earlier.Ptr->stripPointerCasts(); + const Value *P2 = Later.Ptr->stripPointerCasts(); - // Make sure that the start pointers are the same. - if (P1 != P2) - return false; - - // If we don't know the sizes of either access, then we can't do a comparison. + // If the start pointers are the same, we just have to compare sizes to see if + // the later store was larger than the earlier store. + if (P1 == P2) { + // If we don't know the sizes of either access, then we can't do a + // comparison. + if (Later.Size == AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize || + Earlier.Size == AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize) { + // If we have no TargetData information around, then the size of the store + // is inferrable from the pointee type. If they are the same type, then + // we know that the store is safe. + if (AA.getTargetData() == 0) + return Later.Ptr->getType() == Earlier.Ptr->getType(); + return false; + } + + // Make sure that the Later size is >= the Earlier size. + if (Later.Size < Earlier.Size) + return false; + return true; + } + + // Otherwise, we have to have size information, and the later store has to be + // larger than the earlier one. if (Later.Size == AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize || - Earlier.Size == AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize) { - // If we have no TargetData information around, then the size of the store - // is inferrable from the pointee type. If they are the same type, then we - // know that the store is safe. - if (AA.getTargetData() == 0) - return Later.Ptr->getType() == Earlier.Ptr->getType(); + Earlier.Size == AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize || + Later.Size <= Earlier.Size || + AA.getTargetData() == 0) return false; - } - // Make sure that the Later size is >= the Earlier size. - if (Later.Size < Earlier.Size) + const TargetData &TD = *AA.getTargetData(); + + // Okay, we have stores to two completely different pointers. Try to + // decompose the pointer into a "base + constant_offset" form. If the base + // pointers are equal, then we can reason about the two stores. + int64_t Off1 = 0, Off2 = 0; + const Value *BP1 = GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(P1, Off1, TD); + const Value *BP2 = GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset(P2, Off2, TD); + + // If the base pointers still differ, we have two completely different stores. + if (BP1 != BP2) return false; + // Otherwise, we might have a situation like: + // store i16 -> P + 1 Byte + // store i32 -> P + // In this case, we see if the later store completely overlaps all bytes + // stored by the previous store. + if (Off1 < Off2 || // Earlier starts before Later. + Off1+Earlier.Size > Off2+Later.Size) // Earlier goes beyond Later. + return false; + // Otherwise, we have complete overlap. return true; } diff --git a/test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/PartialStore.ll b/test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/PartialStore.ll index a563d8f7a0f..999229885dd 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/PartialStore.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/PartialStore.ll @@ -36,3 +36,19 @@ define i32 @test3(double %__x) { %tmp.7 = zext i1 %tmp.6 to i32 ret i32 %tmp.7 } + +; PR6043 +define void @test4(i8* %P) { +; CHECK: @test4 +; CHECK-NEXT: bitcast +; CHECK-NEXT: store double + + store i8 19, i8* %P ;; dead + %A = getelementptr i8* %P, i32 3 + + store i8 42, i8* %A ;; dead + + %Q = bitcast i8* %P to double* + store double 0.0, double* %Q + ret void +}