From: Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:14:06 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Fix spelling, grammar, and match naming convention for test files.
X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d114b41e62d8b784a9a48644d72489eba37c8a31;p=oota-llvm.git

Fix spelling, grammar, and match naming convention for test files.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@193130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp b/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp
index 8621f1a78d9..911c14e7e31 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp
@@ -359,13 +359,13 @@ bool DAE::RemoveDeadArgumentsFromCallers(Function &Fn)
 
   // If a function seen at compile time is not necessarily the one linked to
   // the binary being built, it is illegal to change the actual arguments
-  // passing to it. These functions can be captured by isWeakForLinker().
+  // passed to it. These functions can be captured by isWeakForLinker().
   // *NOTE* that mayBeOverridden() is insufficient for this purpose as it
-  // dosen't include linkage types like AvailableExternallyLinkage and
+  // doesn't include linkage types like AvailableExternallyLinkage and
   // LinkOnceODRLinkage. Take link_odr* as an example, it indicates a set of
   // *EQUIVALENT* globals that can be merged at link-time. However, the
   // semantic of *EQUIVALENT*-functions includes parameters. Changing
-  // parameters breaks the assumption.
+  // parameters breaks this assumption.
   //
   if (Fn.isWeakForLinker())
     return false;
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-unsafe-math.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-unsafe-math.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f06d9f1dc4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-unsafe-math.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -enable-unsafe-fp-math -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -mcpu=corei7-avx | FileCheck %s 
+
+
+; rdar://13126763
+; Expression "x + x*x" was mistakenly transformed into "x * 3.0f".
+
+define float @test1(float %x) {
+  %t1 = fmul fast float %x, %x
+  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
+  ret float %t2
+; CHECK: test1
+; CHECK: vaddss
+}
+
+; (x + x) + x => x * 3.0
+define float @test2(float %x) {
+  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %x
+  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
+  ret float %t2
+; CHECK: .long  1077936128
+; CHECK: test2
+; CHECK: vmulss LCPI1_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
+}
+
+; x + (x + x) => x * 3.0
+define float @test3(float %x) {
+  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %x
+  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
+  ret float %t2
+; CHECK: .long  1077936128
+; CHECK: test3
+; CHECK: vmulss LCPI2_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
+}
+
+; (y + x) + x != x * 3.0
+define float @test4(float %x, float %y) {
+  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %y
+  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
+  ret float %t2
+; CHECK: test4
+; CHECK: vaddss
+}
+
+; rdar://13445387
+; "x + x + x => 3.0 * x" should be disabled after legalization because 
+; Instruction-Selection doesn't know how to handle "3.0"
+; 
+define float @test5() {
+  %mul.i.i151 = fmul <4 x float> zeroinitializer, zeroinitializer
+  %vecext.i8.i152 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 1
+  %vecext1.i9.i153 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 0
+  %add.i10.i154 = fadd float %vecext1.i9.i153, %vecext.i8.i152
+  %vecext.i7.i155 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 2
+  %add.i.i156 = fadd float %vecext.i7.i155, %add.i10.i154
+  ret float %add.i.i156
+}
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine_unsafe_math.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine_unsafe_math.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index 592cf1bec2e..00000000000
--- a/test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine_unsafe_math.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: llc < %s -enable-unsafe-fp-math -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -mcpu=corei7-avx | FileCheck %s 
-
-
-; rdar://13126763
-; Expression "x + x*x" was mistakenly transformed into "x * 3.0f".
-
-define float @test1(float %x) {
-  %t1 = fmul fast float %x, %x
-  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
-  ret float %t2
-; CHECK: test1
-; CHECK: vaddss
-}
-
-; (x + x) + x => x * 3.0
-define float @test2(float %x) {
-  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %x
-  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
-  ret float %t2
-; CHECK: .long  1077936128
-; CHECK: test2
-; CHECK: vmulss LCPI1_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
-}
-
-; x + (x + x) => x * 3.0
-define float @test3(float %x) {
-  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %x
-  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
-  ret float %t2
-; CHECK: .long  1077936128
-; CHECK: test3
-; CHECK: vmulss LCPI2_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
-}
-
-; (y + x) + x != x * 3.0
-define float @test4(float %x, float %y) {
-  %t1 = fadd fast float %x, %y
-  %t2 = fadd fast float %t1, %x
-  ret float %t2
-; CHECK: test4
-; CHECK: vaddss
-}
-
-; rdar://13445387
-; "x + x + x => 3.0 * x" should be disabled after legalization because 
-; Instruction-Selection dosen't know how to handle "3.0"
-; 
-define float @test5() {
-  %mul.i.i151 = fmul <4 x float> zeroinitializer, zeroinitializer
-  %vecext.i8.i152 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 1
-  %vecext1.i9.i153 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 0
-  %add.i10.i154 = fadd float %vecext1.i9.i153, %vecext.i8.i152
-  %vecext.i7.i155 = extractelement <4 x float> %mul.i.i151, i32 2
-  %add.i.i156 = fadd float %vecext.i7.i155, %add.i10.i154
-  ret float %add.i.i156
-}