From: Heiko Stuebner Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:36:20 +0000 (+0200) Subject: FROMLIST: clk: fix inconsistent use of req_rate X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~2666 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd7fe1d5e1b1d5d9c66246f51aad0fdd072d7401;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git FROMLIST: clk: fix inconsistent use of req_rate The req_rate property seems to be made to hold the rate requested through clk_set_rate. Currently it gets initialized in clk_init to the clocks current rate and then adapted in clk_set_rate calls. Orphan clocks and their children get initialized to a rate of 0 and req_rate never gets re-set when these lose their orphan-status. Initializing req_rate to the clocks rate also is unintuitive as it just copies the value that is already in the rate property and also looses the information if a component actually requested a specific rate. So separate the requested rate and only set it in clk_core_set_rate_nolock when a real rate gets requested. The users of the req_rate __clk_put and clk_set_rate_range that adjust a clock based on that value use req_rate at first and fall back to rate if no rate had been requested now. (am from https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8993751/) Change-Id: I9e345e1e9d0c101d5c3c7064b6c2d2724f9eac4f Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng --- diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 544c9564c621..f66af1ccdb9f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -1520,8 +1520,10 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core, return 0; /* bail early if nothing to do */ - if (rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core)) + if (rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core)) { + core->req_rate = req_rate; return 0; + } if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_GATE) && core->prepare_count) return -EBUSY; @@ -1612,9 +1614,14 @@ int clk_set_rate_range(struct clk *clk, unsigned long min, unsigned long max) clk_prepare_lock(); if (min != clk->min_rate || max != clk->max_rate) { + unsigned long rate = clk->core->req_rate; + + if (!rate) + rate = clk->core->rate; + clk->min_rate = min; clk->max_rate = max; - ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate); + ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate); } clk_prepare_unlock(); @@ -2456,7 +2463,7 @@ static int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk_user) rate = core->parent->rate; else rate = 0; - core->rate = core->req_rate = rate; + core->rate = rate; /* * walk the list of orphan clocks and reparent any that are children of @@ -2794,6 +2801,7 @@ int __clk_get(struct clk *clk) void __clk_put(struct clk *clk) { + unsigned long rate; struct module *owner; if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk))) @@ -2802,9 +2810,13 @@ void __clk_put(struct clk *clk) clk_prepare_lock(); hlist_del(&clk->clks_node); - if (clk->min_rate > clk->core->req_rate || - clk->max_rate < clk->core->req_rate) - clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate); + + rate = clk->core->req_rate; + if (!rate) + rate = clk->core->rate; + + if (clk->min_rate > rate || clk->max_rate < rate) + clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate); owner = clk->core->owner; kref_put(&clk->core->ref, __clk_release);