From: Dave Chinner Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 23:18:18 +0000 (+1000) Subject: xfs: mmap lock needs to be inside freeze protection X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~176^2~1521^2~4^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ec56b1f1fdc69599963574ce94cc5693d535dd64;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git xfs: mmap lock needs to be inside freeze protection Lock ordering for the new mmap lock needs to be: mmap_sem sb_start_pagefault i_mmap_lock page lock Right now xfs_vm_page_mkwrite gets this the wrong way around, While technically it cannot deadlock due to the current freeze ordering, it's still a landmine that might explode if we change anything in future. Hence we need to nest the locks correctly. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Brian Foster Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c index 8121e75352ee..0b4e79fd8d05 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c @@ -1487,15 +1487,20 @@ xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite( struct vm_fault *vmf) { struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host); - int error; + int ret; trace_xfs_filemap_page_mkwrite(ip); + sb_start_pagefault(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb); + file_update_time(vma->vm_file); xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED); - error = block_page_mkwrite(vma, vmf, xfs_get_blocks); + + ret = __block_page_mkwrite(vma, vmf, xfs_get_blocks); + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED); + sb_end_pagefault(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb); - return error; + return block_page_mkwrite_return(ret); } const struct file_operations xfs_file_operations = {