From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:04:09 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: timekeeping: Use timekeeping_update() instead of memcpy()
X-Git-Tag: firefly_0821_release~176^2~3477^2~55
X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f111adfdd7ff7d9fe54b6efa440b80824984749c;p=firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git

timekeeping: Use timekeeping_update() instead of memcpy()

We already have a function which does the right thing, that also makes
sure that the coming ktime_t based cached values are getting updated.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 7ca150ad387d..bfe3ea09afc9 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -883,8 +883,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	tmp.tv_nsec = 0;
 	tk_set_sleep_time(tk, tmp);
 
-	memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper,
-	       sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper));
+	timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR);
 
 	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);