From fd45fa1503de725801be3db33c7e860298fc82a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:24:29 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Make atomic load and store of pointers work.  Tighten
 verification of atomic operations so other unexpected operations don't slip
 through.  Based on patch by Logan Chien. PR11786/PR13186.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 .../SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp      |  4 +--
 lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp                       | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-pointer.ll            | 22 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-pointer.ll

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index ba5bd79722c..ae2b32969a7 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -3460,7 +3460,7 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitAtomicLoad(const LoadInst &I) {
 
   SDValue InChain = getRoot();
 
-  EVT VT = EVT::getEVT(I.getType());
+  EVT VT = TLI.getValueType(I.getType());
 
   if (I.getAlignment() * 8 < VT.getSizeInBits())
     report_fatal_error("Cannot generate unaligned atomic load");
@@ -3490,7 +3490,7 @@ void SelectionDAGBuilder::visitAtomicStore(const StoreInst &I) {
 
   SDValue InChain = getRoot();
 
-  EVT VT = EVT::getEVT(I.getValueOperand()->getType());
+  EVT VT = TLI.getValueType(I.getValueOperand()->getType());
 
   if (I.getAlignment() * 8 < VT.getSizeInBits())
     report_fatal_error("Cannot generate unaligned atomic store");
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
index 970e9eb58db..c932d9e5398 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
@@ -1378,6 +1378,15 @@ void Verifier::visitLoadInst(LoadInst &LI) {
             "Load cannot have Release ordering", &LI);
     Assert1(LI.getAlignment() != 0,
             "Atomic load must specify explicit alignment", &LI);
+    if (!ElTy->isPointerTy()) {
+      Assert2(ElTy->isIntegerTy(),
+              "atomic store operand must have integer type!",
+              &LI, ElTy);
+      unsigned Size = ElTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
+      Assert2(Size >= 8 && !(Size & (Size - 1)),
+              "atomic store operand must be power-of-two byte-sized integer",
+              &LI, ElTy);
+    }
   } else {
     Assert1(LI.getSynchScope() == CrossThread,
             "Non-atomic load cannot have SynchronizationScope specified", &LI);
@@ -1444,6 +1453,15 @@ void Verifier::visitStoreInst(StoreInst &SI) {
             "Store cannot have Acquire ordering", &SI);
     Assert1(SI.getAlignment() != 0,
             "Atomic store must specify explicit alignment", &SI);
+    if (!ElTy->isPointerTy()) {
+      Assert2(ElTy->isIntegerTy(),
+              "atomic store operand must have integer type!",
+              &SI, ElTy);
+      unsigned Size = ElTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
+      Assert2(Size >= 8 && !(Size & (Size - 1)),
+              "atomic store operand must be power-of-two byte-sized integer",
+              &SI, ElTy);
+    }
   } else {
     Assert1(SI.getSynchScope() == CrossThread,
             "Non-atomic store cannot have SynchronizationScope specified", &SI);
@@ -1471,6 +1489,13 @@ void Verifier::visitAtomicCmpXchgInst(AtomicCmpXchgInst &CXI) {
   PointerType *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(CXI.getOperand(0)->getType());
   Assert1(PTy, "First cmpxchg operand must be a pointer.", &CXI);
   Type *ElTy = PTy->getElementType();
+  Assert2(ElTy->isIntegerTy(),
+          "cmpxchg operand must have integer type!",
+          &CXI, ElTy);
+  unsigned Size = ElTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
+  Assert2(Size >= 8 && !(Size & (Size - 1)),
+          "cmpxchg operand must be power-of-two byte-sized integer",
+          &CXI, ElTy);
   Assert2(ElTy == CXI.getOperand(1)->getType(),
           "Expected value type does not match pointer operand type!",
           &CXI, ElTy);
@@ -1488,6 +1513,13 @@ void Verifier::visitAtomicRMWInst(AtomicRMWInst &RMWI) {
   PointerType *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(RMWI.getOperand(0)->getType());
   Assert1(PTy, "First atomicrmw operand must be a pointer.", &RMWI);
   Type *ElTy = PTy->getElementType();
+  Assert2(ElTy->isIntegerTy(),
+          "atomicrmw operand must have integer type!",
+          &RMWI, ElTy);
+  unsigned Size = ElTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
+  Assert2(Size >= 8 && !(Size & (Size - 1)),
+          "atomicrmw operand must be power-of-two byte-sized integer",
+          &RMWI, ElTy);
   Assert2(ElTy == RMWI.getOperand(1)->getType(),
           "Argument value type does not match pointer operand type!",
           &RMWI, ElTy);
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-pointer.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-pointer.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a455277be4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-pointer.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-none-linux | FileCheck %s
+
+define i32* @test_atomic_ptr_load(i32** %a0) {
+; CHECK: test_atomic_ptr_load
+; CHECK: movl
+; CHECK: movl
+; CHECK: ret
+0:
+  %0 = load atomic i32** %a0 seq_cst, align 4
+  ret i32* %0
+}
+
+define void @test_atomic_ptr_store(i32* %a0, i32** %a1) {
+; CHECK: test_atomic_ptr_store
+; CHECK: movl
+; CHECK: movl
+; CHECK: xchgl
+; CHECK: ret
+0:
+  store atomic i32* %a0, i32** %a1 seq_cst, align 4
+  ret void
+}
-- 
2.34.1