From 06028bcce46555e84944b7f8b674c05f32b2f07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Gohman Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:21:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] In ScalarEvolution::forgetValue, eliminate any SCEVUnknown entries associated with the value being erased in the folding set map. These entries used to be harmless, because a SCEVUnknown doesn't store any information about its Value*, so having a new Value allocated at the old Value's address wasn't a problem. But now that ScalarEvolution is storing more information about values, this is no longer safe. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@107316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp index d541b5535d3..413b3b47f92 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp @@ -3657,6 +3657,26 @@ void ScalarEvolution::forgetValue(Value *V) { ConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue.erase(PN); } + // If there's a SCEVUnknown tying this value into the SCEV + // space, remove it from the folding set map. The SCEVUnknown + // object and any other SCEV objects which reference it + // (transitively) remain allocated, effectively leaked until + // the underlying BumpPtrAllocator is freed. + // + // This permits SCEV pointers to be used as keys in maps + // such as the ValuesAtScopes map. + FoldingSetNodeID ID; + ID.AddInteger(scUnknown); + ID.AddPointer(I); + void *IP; + if (SCEV *S = UniqueSCEVs.FindNodeOrInsertPos(ID, IP)) { + UniqueSCEVs.RemoveNode(S); + + // This isn't necessary, but we might as well remove the + // value from the ValuesAtScopes map too. + ValuesAtScopes.erase(S); + } + PushDefUseChildren(I, Worklist); } } -- 2.34.1