From 0bb70bf601579b0d4c56acbb54b8eb0688541e19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ellenberg Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:53:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drbd: remove outdated comment and dead code Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h index 3a941744f069..72d204750408 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h @@ -858,10 +858,6 @@ struct drbd_bitmap; /* opaque for drbd_conf */ /* THINK maybe we actually want to use the default "event/%s" worker threads * or similar in linux 2.6, which uses per cpu data and threads. - * - * To be general, this might need a spin_lock member. - * For now, please use the mdev->req_lock to protect list_head, - * see drbd_queue_work below. */ struct drbd_work_queue { struct list_head q; @@ -1894,13 +1890,6 @@ static inline sector_t drbd_md_ss__(struct drbd_conf *mdev, } } -static inline void -_drbd_queue_work(struct drbd_work_queue *q, struct drbd_work *w) -{ - list_add_tail(&w->list, &q->q); - up(&q->s); -} - static inline void drbd_queue_work_front(struct drbd_work_queue *q, struct drbd_work *w) { -- 2.34.1