From 1f7dd3e9d62b25c7b79f913f37c2242a61295de4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:25:30 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] libata: check if port is disabled after internal command libata core is being changed to disallow port/device disable on lower layers. However, some LLDDs (sata_mv) directly disable port on command failure. This patch makes ata_exec_internal() check whether a port got disabled after an internal command. If it is, AC_ERR_SYSTEM is added to err_mask and the port gets re-enabled. As internal command failure results in device disable for drivers which don't implement newer reset/EH callbacks, this change results in no behavior change for single device per port controllers. For slave-possible LLDDs which disable port on command failure, (1) such drivers don't exist currently, (2) issuing command to the other device of once-disabled port shouldn't result in catastrophe even if such driver exists. So, this should be enough as a temporary measure. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/scsi/libata-core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c index 1063928e3824..9cd9053e78fe 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c @@ -1009,6 +1009,22 @@ ata_exec_internal(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev, ata_qc_free(qc); + /* XXX - Some LLDDs (sata_mv) disable port on command failure. + * Until those drivers are fixed, we detect the condition + * here, fail the command with AC_ERR_SYSTEM and reenable the + * port. + * + * Note that this doesn't change any behavior as internal + * command failure results in disabling the device in the + * higher layer for LLDDs without new reset/EH callbacks. + * + * Kill the following code as soon as those drivers are fixed. + */ + if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_PORT_DISABLED) { + err_mask |= AC_ERR_SYSTEM; + ata_port_probe(ap); + } + return err_mask; } -- 2.34.1