From 23bdd703a585a869f2eb32fb9f66749d0476d71e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:52:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sched: do not set softirqs to nice +19
do not set softirqs to nice +19. _If_ for whatever reason
we missed to process some high-prio softirq and woke up
ksoftirqd, we should give it a fair chance to actually
get some work done, even if the system is under load.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 0b9886a00e74..73217a9e2875 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -488,7 +488,6 @@ void __init softirq_init(void)
static int ksoftirqd(void * __bind_cpu)
{
- set_user_nice(current, 19);
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
--
2.34.1