From 3ec01b7dac769449723a25d8f7d33b49c917ccc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eli Friedman Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:41:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add an instcombine for constructs like a | -(b != c); a select is more canonical, and generally leads to better code. Found while looking at an article about saturating arithmetic. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@129545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- .../InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp | 9 ++++++++- test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp index 1cb18e12eef..6cf405328a3 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp @@ -2003,7 +2003,14 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitOr(BinaryOperator &I) { } } } - + + // or(sext(A), B) -> A ? -1 : B where A is an i1 + // or(A, sext(B)) -> B ? -1 : A where B is an i1 + if (match(Op0, m_SExt(m_Value(A))) && A->getType()->isIntegerTy(1)) + return SelectInst::Create(A, ConstantInt::getSigned(I.getType(), -1), Op1); + if (match(Op1, m_SExt(m_Value(A))) && A->getType()->isIntegerTy(1)) + return SelectInst::Create(A, ConstantInt::getSigned(I.getType(), -1), Op0); + // Note: If we've gotten to the point of visiting the outer OR, then the // inner one couldn't be simplified. If it was a constant, then it won't // be simplified by a later pass either, so we try swapping the inner/outer diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll index f82f9faab2d..94a57321862 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/or.ll @@ -390,3 +390,22 @@ define i1 @test36(i32 %x) { ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 } +define i32 @test37(i32* %xp, i32 %y) { +; CHECK: @test37 +; CHECK: select i1 %tobool, i32 -1, i32 %x + %tobool = icmp ne i32 %y, 0 + %sext = sext i1 %tobool to i32 + %x = load i32* %xp + %or = or i32 %sext, %x + ret i32 %or +} + +define i32 @test38(i32* %xp, i32 %y) { +; CHECK: @test38 +; CHECK: select i1 %tobool, i32 -1, i32 %x + %tobool = icmp ne i32 %y, 0 + %sext = sext i1 %tobool to i32 + %x = load i32* %xp + %or = or i32 %x, %sext + ret i32 %or +} -- 2.34.1