From 40a85d68185f9d9e7d370919f8a3532b0d259266 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Semwal Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 21:48:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Decouple IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE and PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE From: Bjorn Helgaas [ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ] Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE. PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use. IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 71d9a6d1bd56..b83df942794f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type, mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; } } else { - res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE); + if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE) + res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE; l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK; -- 2.34.1