From 47147014018aecedf366187556cb4a2e06041181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jjenista <jjenista>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:43:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] trying to make disjointness example versus shape even
 simpler, still get totally-shared result

---
 .../OwnershipAnalysisTest/versusShape/test.java      | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Robust/src/Tests/OwnershipAnalysisTest/versusShape/test.java b/Robust/src/Tests/OwnershipAnalysisTest/versusShape/test.java
index 166f063d..255456c6 100644
--- a/Robust/src/Tests/OwnershipAnalysisTest/versusShape/test.java
+++ b/Robust/src/Tests/OwnershipAnalysisTest/versusShape/test.java
@@ -39,15 +39,17 @@ public class Test {
       DenseGraph  d = (DenseGraph)  dSet.iterator().next();
       process(  );
       */
-
-
+      
+      
       Node sNew = disjoint sparse new Node( 3*i );
       //Node dNew = disjoint dense  new Node( 2*i );
-      sSet.add( sNew );
+      
       //dSet.add( dNew );
-      Node s = (Node) sSet.iterator().next();
+      //Node s = (Node) sSet.iterator().next();
       //Node d = (Node) dSet.iterator().next();
-      growSparseAndDense( s /*, d*/ );
+      growSparseAndDense( sNew /*, d*/ );
+    
+      sSet.add( sNew );
     }
   }
 
-- 
2.34.1