From 5721d2f674008cd2cfa5696441e46daa035408b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnold Schwaighofer Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:17:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Don't vectorize if there are outside loop users of the induction variable. We would have to compute the pre increment value, either by computing it on every loop iteration or by splitting the edge out of the loop and inserting a computation for it there. For now, just give up vectorizing such loops. Fixes PR17179. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190790 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 6 ++++ .../LoopVectorize/no_outside_user.ll | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp index 9e7335af5f7..1d82c7b8f54 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp @@ -2866,6 +2866,12 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::canVectorizeInstrs() { DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found an induction variable.\n"); Inductions[Phi] = InductionInfo(StartValue, IK); + + // Until we explicitly handle the case of an induction variable with + // an outside loop user we have to give up vectorizing this loop. + if (hasOutsideLoopUser(TheLoop, it, AllowedExit)) + return false; + continue; } diff --git a/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/no_outside_user.ll b/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/no_outside_user.ll index 6f0357c5e54..c83d7aac7b6 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/no_outside_user.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/no_outside_user.ll @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f3 ; We used to vectorize this loop. But it has a value that is used outside of the ; and is not a recognized reduction variable "tmp17". +; CHECK-LABEL: main ; CHECK-NOT: <2 x i32> define i32 @main() { @@ -38,4 +39,33 @@ f1.exit.loopexit: ret i32 %.lcssa } +; Don't vectorize this loop. Its phi node (induction variable) has an outside +; loop user. We currently don't handle this case. +; PR17179 +; CHECK-LABEL: test2 +; CHECK-NOT: <2 x + +@x1 = common global i32 0, align 4 +@x2 = common global i32 0, align 4 +@x0 = common global i32 0, align 4 + +define i32 @test2() { +entry: + store i32 0, i32* @x1, align 4 + %0 = load i32* @x0, align 4 + br label %for.cond1.preheader + +for.cond1.preheader: + %inc7 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.cond1.preheader ] + %inc = add nsw i32 %inc7, 1 + %cmp = icmp eq i32 %inc, 52 + br i1 %cmp, label %for.end5, label %for.cond1.preheader + +for.end5: + %inc7.lcssa = phi i32 [ %inc7, %for.cond1.preheader ] + %xor = xor i32 %inc7.lcssa, %0 + store i32 52, i32* @x1, align 4 + store i32 1, i32* @x2, align 4 + ret i32 %xor +} -- 2.34.1