From 5c51543b0ae45967cfa99ca16748dc72888cc265 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:33:18 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: Fix a double lock bug of kprobe_mutex Fix a double locking bug caused when debug.kprobe-optimization=0. While the proc_kprobes_optimization_handler locks kprobe_mutex, wait_for_kprobe_optimizer locks it again and that causes a double lock. To fix the bug, this introduces different mutex for protecting sysctl parameter and locks it in proc_kprobes_optimization_handler. Of course, since we need to lock kprobe_mutex when touching kprobes resources, that is done in *optimize_all_kprobes(). This bug was introduced by commit ad72b3bea744 ("kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()") Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: "David S. Miller" Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/kprobes.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index e35be53f6613..3fed7f0cbcdf 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -794,16 +794,16 @@ out: } #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL -/* This should be called with kprobe_mutex locked */ static void __kprobes optimize_all_kprobes(void) { struct hlist_head *head; struct kprobe *p; unsigned int i; + mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); /* If optimization is already allowed, just return */ if (kprobes_allow_optimization) - return; + goto out; kprobes_allow_optimization = true; for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) { @@ -813,18 +813,22 @@ static void __kprobes optimize_all_kprobes(void) optimize_kprobe(p); } printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally optimized\n"); +out: + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); } -/* This should be called with kprobe_mutex locked */ static void __kprobes unoptimize_all_kprobes(void) { struct hlist_head *head; struct kprobe *p; unsigned int i; + mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); /* If optimization is already prohibited, just return */ - if (!kprobes_allow_optimization) + if (!kprobes_allow_optimization) { + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); return; + } kprobes_allow_optimization = false; for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) { @@ -834,11 +838,14 @@ static void __kprobes unoptimize_all_kprobes(void) unoptimize_kprobe(p, false); } } + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); + /* Wait for unoptimizing completion */ wait_for_kprobe_optimizer(); printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally unoptimized\n"); } +static DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_sysctl_mutex); int sysctl_kprobes_optimization; int proc_kprobes_optimization_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buffer, size_t *length, @@ -846,7 +853,7 @@ int proc_kprobes_optimization_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, { int ret; - mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex); + mutex_lock(&kprobe_sysctl_mutex); sysctl_kprobes_optimization = kprobes_allow_optimization ? 1 : 0; ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); @@ -854,7 +861,7 @@ int proc_kprobes_optimization_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, optimize_all_kprobes(); else unoptimize_all_kprobes(); - mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&kprobe_sysctl_mutex); return ret; } -- 2.34.1