From 6c07aee7c993ff83a744d1fa3c6e0539250e5ef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Lattner Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:06:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a bug emitting branches that broke a lot of programs. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@19452 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp index 1692d3f8957..e9531c5db9f 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ namespace { } void EmitCMP(SDOperand LHS, SDOperand RHS); - bool EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond); + bool EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Chain, SDOperand Cond); void EmitSelectCC(SDOperand Cond, MVT::ValueType SVT, unsigned RTrue, unsigned RFalse, unsigned RDest); unsigned SelectExpr(SDOperand N); @@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void EmitSetCC(MachineBasicBlock *BB, unsigned DestReg, /// the Dest block if the Cond condition is true. If we cannot fold this /// condition into the branch, return true. /// -bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond) { +bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Chain, + SDOperand Cond) { // FIXME: Evaluate whether it would be good to emit code like (X < Y) | (A > // B) using two conditional branches instead of one condbr, two setcc's, and // an or. @@ -568,6 +569,7 @@ bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond) { // And and or set the flags for us, so there is no need to emit a TST of the // result. It is only safe to do this if there is only a single use of the // AND/OR though, otherwise we don't know it will be emitted here. + Select(Chain); SelectExpr(Cond); BuildMI(BB, X86::JNE, 1).addMBB(Dest); return false; @@ -577,7 +579,14 @@ bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond) { if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::XOR) if (ConstantSDNode *NC = dyn_cast(Cond.Val->getOperand(1))) if (NC->isAllOnesValue()) { - unsigned CondR = SelectExpr(Cond.Val->getOperand(0)); + unsigned CondR; + if (getRegPressure(Chain) > getRegPressure(Cond)) { + Select(Chain); + CondR = SelectExpr(Cond.Val->getOperand(0)); + } else { + CondR = SelectExpr(Cond.Val->getOperand(0)); + Select(Chain); + } BuildMI(BB, X86::TEST8rr, 2).addReg(CondR).addReg(CondR); BuildMI(BB, X86::JE, 1).addMBB(Dest); return false; @@ -604,6 +613,7 @@ bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond) { case ISD::SETULE: Opc = X86::JBE; break; case ISD::SETUGE: Opc = X86::JAE; break; } + Select(Chain); EmitCMP(SetCC->getOperand(0), SetCC->getOperand(1)); BuildMI(BB, Opc, 1).addMBB(Dest); return false; @@ -660,6 +670,7 @@ bool ISel::EmitBranchCC(MachineBasicBlock *Dest, SDOperand Cond) { return true; // FIXME: Emit more efficient code for this branch. } + Select(Chain); EmitCMP(SetCC->getOperand(0), SetCC->getOperand(1)); BuildMI(BB, Opc, 1).addMBB(Dest); if (Opc2) @@ -1906,21 +1917,20 @@ void ISel::Select(SDOperand N) { MachineBasicBlock *Dest = cast(N.getOperand(2))->getBasicBlock(); - bool ChainFirst = - getRegPressure(N.getOperand(0)) > getRegPressure(N.getOperand(1)); - - if (ChainFirst) Select(N.getOperand(0)); - // Try to fold a setcc into the branch. If this fails, emit a test/jne // pair. - if (EmitBranchCC(Dest, N.getOperand(1))) { - Tmp1 = SelectExpr(N.getOperand(1)); + if (EmitBranchCC(Dest, N.getOperand(0), N.getOperand(1))) { + if (getRegPressure(N.getOperand(0)) > getRegPressure(N.getOperand(1))) { + Select(N.getOperand(0)); + Tmp1 = SelectExpr(N.getOperand(1)); + } else { + Tmp1 = SelectExpr(N.getOperand(1)); + Select(N.getOperand(0)); + } BuildMI(BB, X86::TEST8rr, 2).addReg(Tmp1).addReg(Tmp1); BuildMI(BB, X86::JNE, 1).addMBB(Dest); } - if (!ChainFirst) Select(N.getOperand(0)); - return; } case ISD::LOAD: -- 2.34.1