From 6e29ec5701e9d44fa02b96c1c5c45f7516182b65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gautham R Shenoy Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:40:49 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] sched: Replace first_cpu() with cpumask_first() in ILB nomination code Stephen Rothwell reported this build warning: > kernel/sched.c: In function 'find_new_ilb': > kernel/sched.c:4355: warning: passing argument 1 of '__first_cpu' from incompatible pointer type > > Possibly caused by commit f711f6090a81cbd396b63de90f415d33f563af9b > ("sched: Nominate idle load balancer from a semi-idle package") from > the sched tree. Should this call to first_cpu be cpumask_first? For !(CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT), find_new_ilb() nominates the Idle load balancer as the first cpu from the nohz.cpu_mask. This code uses the older API first_cpu(). Replace it with cpumask_first(), which is the correct API here. [ Impact: cleanup, address build warning ] Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy Cc: Rusty Russell LKML-Reference: <20090421031049.GA4140@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 797f6fdabadf..54d67b94f1a9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -4356,7 +4356,7 @@ out_done: #else /* (CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) */ static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu) { - return first_cpu(nohz.cpu_mask); + return cpumask_first(nohz.cpu_mask); } #endif -- 2.34.1