From 75592e4137c3ae7800e1fb8736db28a65bb3c94d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Lattner Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:31:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Implement dynamic allocas correctly. In particular, because we were copying directly out of R1 (without using a CopyFromReg, which uses a chain), multiple allocas were getting CSE'd together, producing bogus code. For this: int %foo(bool %X, int %A, int %B) { br bool %X, label %T, label %F F: %G = alloca int %H = alloca int store int %A, int* %G store int %B, int* %H %R = load int* %G ret int %R T: ret int 0 } We were generating: _foo: stwu r1, -16(r1) stw r31, 4(r1) or r31, r1, r1 stw r1, 12(r31) cmpwi cr0, r3, 0 bne cr0, .LBB_foo_2 ; T .LBB_foo_1: ; F li r2, 16 subf r2, r2, r1 ;; One alloca or r1, r2, r2 or r3, r1, r1 or r1, r2, r2 or r2, r1, r1 stw r4, 0(r3) stw r5, 0(r2) lwz r3, 0(r3) lwz r1, 12(r31) lwz r31, 4(r31) lwz r1, 0(r1) blr .LBB_foo_2: ; T li r3, 0 lwz r1, 12(r31) lwz r31, 4(r31) lwz r1, 0(r1) blr Now we generate: _foo: stwu r1, -16(r1) stw r31, 4(r1) or r31, r1, r1 stw r1, 12(r31) cmpwi cr0, r3, 0 bne cr0, .LBB_foo_2 ; T .LBB_foo_1: ; F or r2, r1, r1 li r3, 16 subf r2, r3, r2 ;; Alloca 1 or r1, r2, r2 or r2, r1, r1 or r6, r1, r1 subf r3, r3, r6 ;; Alloca 2 or r1, r3, r3 or r3, r1, r1 stw r4, 0(r2) stw r5, 0(r3) lwz r3, 0(r2) lwz r1, 12(r31) lwz r31, 4(r31) lwz r1, 0(r1) blr .LBB_foo_2: ; T li r3, 0 lwz r1, 12(r31) lwz r31, 4(r31) lwz r1, 0(r1) blr This fixes Povray and SPASS with the dag isel, the last two failing cases. Tommorow we will hopefully turn it on by default! :) git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@23190 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp b/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp index c650c0f3082..abb9c1fe249 100644 --- a/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelDAGToDAG.cpp @@ -754,9 +754,12 @@ SDOperand PPC32DAGToDAGISel::Select(SDOperand Op) { SDOperand R1Reg = CurDAG->getRegister(PPC::R1, MVT::i32); + SDOperand R1Val = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(Chain, PPC::R1, MVT::i32); + Chain = R1Val.getValue(1); + // Subtract the amount (guaranteed to be a multiple of the stack alignment) // from the stack pointer, giving us the result pointer. - SDOperand Result = CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::SUBF, MVT::i32, Amt, R1Reg); + SDOperand Result = CurDAG->getTargetNode(PPC::SUBF, MVT::i32, Amt, R1Val); // Copy this result back into R1. Chain = CurDAG->getNode(ISD::CopyToReg, MVT::Other, Chain, R1Reg, Result); -- 2.34.1