From 7eb52512a977854eca51d9b692c2f3be8a0e5eeb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:11:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] zsmalloc: fixup trivial zs size classes value in comments According to calculation, ZS_SIZE_CLASSES value is 255 on systems with 4K page size, not 254. The old value may forget count the ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE in. This patch fixes this trivial issue in the comments. Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c index 5ae5d85b629d..fe78189624cf 100644 --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ #define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE /* - * On systems with 4K page size, this gives 254 size classes! There is a + * On systems with 4K page size, this gives 255 size classes! There is a * trader-off here: * - Large number of size classes is potentially wasteful as free page are * spread across these classes -- 2.34.1