From 82e75d00adc5bde3cf98f11e937eed6127163969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Hunter Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:38:52 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] perf tests: Adjust the vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms test again The kallsyms maps now may map to kcore and the symbol values now may be file offsets. For comparison with vmlinux the virtual memory address is needed which is obtained by unmapping the symbol value. The "vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms" is adjusted accordingly. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1375875537-4509-9-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c b/tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c index e2e14984c3a0..2bd13edcbc17 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/vmlinux-kallsyms.c @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ static int vmlinux_matches_kallsyms_filter(struct map *map __maybe_unused, return 0; } +#define UM(x) kallsyms_map->unmap_ip(kallsyms_map, (x)) + int test__vmlinux_matches_kallsyms(void) { int err = -1; @@ -74,7 +76,7 @@ int test__vmlinux_matches_kallsyms(void) goto out; } - ref_reloc_sym.addr = sym->start; + ref_reloc_sym.addr = UM(sym->start); /* * Step 5: @@ -131,7 +133,7 @@ int test__vmlinux_matches_kallsyms(void) mem_start, NULL, NULL); pair = first_pair; - if (pair && pair->start == mem_start) { + if (pair && UM(pair->start) == mem_start) { next_pair: if (strcmp(sym->name, pair->name) == 0) { /* @@ -143,11 +145,11 @@ next_pair: * off the real size. More than that and we * _really_ have a problem. */ - s64 skew = mem_end - pair->end; + s64 skew = mem_end - UM(pair->end); if (llabs(skew) >= page_size) pr_debug("%#" PRIx64 ": diff end addr for %s v: %#" PRIx64 " k: %#" PRIx64 "\n", mem_start, sym->name, mem_end, - pair->end); + UM(pair->end)); /* * Do not count this as a failure, because we @@ -165,7 +167,7 @@ detour: if (nnd) { struct symbol *next = rb_entry(nnd, struct symbol, rb_node); - if (next->start == mem_start) { + if (UM(next->start) == mem_start) { pair = next; goto next_pair; } -- 2.34.1