From 9d44a73ed4291ffb2a0882739d89bf970dd36828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chad Rosier Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:55:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [LIR] Add support for creating memsets from loops with a negative stride. http://reviews.llvm.org/D14125 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251512 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp | 52 +++++++++++--------- test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll | 44 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp index ef9526fd398..6bea707acf5 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp @@ -31,11 +31,6 @@ // void foo(_Complex float *P) // for (i) { __real__(*P) = 0; __imag__(*P) = 0; } // -// We should enhance this to handle negative strides through memory. -// Alternatively (and perhaps better) we could rely on an earlier pass to force -// forward iteration through memory, which is generally better for cache -// behavior. Negative strides *do* happen for memset/memcpy loops. -// // This could recognize common matrix multiplies and dot product idioms and // replace them with calls to BLAS (if linked in??). // @@ -124,7 +119,7 @@ private: bool processLoopStridedStore(Value *DestPtr, unsigned StoreSize, unsigned StoreAlignment, Value *SplatValue, Instruction *TheStore, const SCEVAddRecExpr *Ev, - const SCEV *BECount); + const SCEV *BECount, bool NegStride); bool processLoopStoreOfLoopLoad(StoreInst *SI, unsigned StoreSize, const SCEVAddRecExpr *StoreEv, const SCEVAddRecExpr *LoadEv, @@ -316,23 +311,21 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStore(StoreInst *SI, const SCEV *BECount) { // Check to see if the stride matches the size of the store. If so, then we // know that every byte is touched in the loop. unsigned StoreSize = (unsigned)SizeInBits >> 3; - const SCEVConstant *Stride = dyn_cast(StoreEv->getOperand(1)); - - if (!Stride || StoreSize != Stride->getValue()->getValue()) { - // TODO: Could also handle negative stride here someday, that will require - // the validity check in mayLoopAccessLocation to be updated though. - // Enable this to print exact negative strides. - if (0 && Stride && StoreSize == -Stride->getValue()->getValue()) { - dbgs() << "NEGATIVE STRIDE: " << *SI << "\n"; - dbgs() << "BB: " << *SI->getParent(); - } + const SCEVConstant *ConstStride = + dyn_cast(StoreEv->getOperand(1)); + if (!ConstStride) return false; - } + + APInt Stride = ConstStride->getValue()->getValue(); + if (StoreSize != Stride && StoreSize != -Stride) + return false; + + bool NegStride = StoreSize == -Stride; // See if we can optimize just this store in isolation. if (processLoopStridedStore(StorePtr, StoreSize, SI->getAlignment(), - StoredVal, SI, StoreEv, BECount)) + StoredVal, SI, StoreEv, BECount, NegStride)) return true; // If the stored value is a strided load in the same loop with the same stride @@ -387,7 +380,7 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopMemSet(MemSetInst *MSI, return processLoopStridedStore(Pointer, (unsigned)SizeInBytes, MSI->getAlignment(), MSI->getValue(), MSI, Ev, - BECount); + BECount, /*NegStride=*/false); } /// mayLoopAccessLocation - Return true if the specified loop might access the @@ -468,7 +461,7 @@ static Constant *getMemSetPatternValue(Value *V, const DataLayout &DL) { bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStridedStore( Value *DestPtr, unsigned StoreSize, unsigned StoreAlignment, Value *StoredVal, Instruction *TheStore, const SCEVAddRecExpr *Ev, - const SCEV *BECount) { + const SCEV *BECount, bool NegStride) { // If the stored value is a byte-wise value (like i32 -1), then it may be // turned into a memset of i8 -1, assuming that all the consecutive bytes @@ -506,15 +499,27 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStridedStore( SCEVExpander Expander(*SE, DL, "loop-idiom"); Type *DestInt8PtrTy = Builder.getInt8PtrTy(DestAS); + Type *IntPtr = Builder.getIntPtrTy(DL, DestAS); + + const SCEV *Start = Ev->getStart(); + // If we have a negative stride, Start refers to the end of the memory + // location we're trying to memset. Therefore, we need to recompute the start + // point, which is just Start - BECount*Size. + if (NegStride) { + const SCEV *Index = SE->getTruncateOrZeroExtend(BECount, IntPtr); + if (StoreSize != 1) + Index = SE->getMulExpr(Index, SE->getConstant(IntPtr, StoreSize), + SCEV::FlagNUW); + Start = SE->getMinusSCEV(Ev->getStart(), Index); + } // Okay, we have a strided store "p[i]" of a splattable value. We can turn // this into a memset in the loop preheader now if we want. However, this // would be unsafe to do if there is anything else in the loop that may read // or write to the aliased location. Check for any overlap by generating the // base pointer and checking the region. - Value *BasePtr = Expander.expandCodeFor(Ev->getStart(), DestInt8PtrTy, - Preheader->getTerminator()); - + Value *BasePtr = + Expander.expandCodeFor(Start, DestInt8PtrTy, Preheader->getTerminator()); if (mayLoopAccessLocation(BasePtr, MRI_ModRef, CurLoop, BECount, StoreSize, *AA, TheStore)) { Expander.clear(); @@ -527,7 +532,6 @@ bool LoopIdiomRecognize::processLoopStridedStore( // The # stored bytes is (BECount+1)*Size. Expand the trip count out to // pointer size if it isn't already. - Type *IntPtr = Builder.getIntPtrTy(DL, DestAS); BECount = SE->getTruncateOrZeroExtend(BECount, IntPtr); const SCEV *NumBytesS = diff --git a/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll b/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll index c633ae95d16..f7317879a36 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll @@ -424,3 +424,47 @@ exit: ret void ; CHECK: ret void } + +; Recognize loops with a negative stride. +define void @test15(i32* nocapture %f) { +entry: + br label %for.body + +for.body: + %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 65536, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] + %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %indvars.iv + store i32 0, i32* %arrayidx, align 4 + %indvars.iv.next = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1 + %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %indvars.iv, 0 + br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup + +for.cond.cleanup: + ret void +; CHECK-LABEL: @test15( +; CHECK: call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* %f1, i8 0, i64 262148, i32 4, i1 false) +; CHECK-NOT: store +; CHECK: ret void +} + +; Loop with a negative stride. Verify an aliasing write to f[65536] prevents +; the creation of a memset. +define void @test16(i32* nocapture %f) { +entry: + %arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 65536 + br label %for.body + +for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body + %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 65536, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ] + %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %indvars.iv + store i32 0, i32* %arrayidx, align 4 + store i32 1, i32* %arrayidx1, align 4 + %indvars.iv.next = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1 + %cmp = icmp sgt i64 %indvars.iv, 0 + br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup + +for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.body + ret void +; CHECK-LABEL: @test16( +; CHECK-NOT: call void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64 +; CHECK: ret void +} -- 2.34.1