From a0fd1efd488092951f310fdb777b8a540cf84dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:34:56 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] UBI: fix buffer padding
Instead of correctly pad the buffer wich we are writing to the
eraseblock during update, we used weird construct:
memset(buf + len, 0xFF, len - len);
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
---
drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
index ddaa1a56cc69..6fa1ab3f2a70 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
@@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ static int write_leb(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol, int lnum,
int err;
if (vol->vol_type == UBI_DYNAMIC_VOLUME) {
- len = ALIGN(len, ubi->min_io_size);
- memset(buf + len, 0xFF, len - len);
+ int l = ALIGN(len, ubi->min_io_size);
- len = ubi_calc_data_len(ubi, buf, len);
+ memset(buf + len, 0xFF, l - len);
+ len = ubi_calc_data_len(ubi, buf, l);
if (len == 0) {
dbg_msg("all %d bytes contain 0xFF - skip", len);
return 0;
--
2.34.1