From ba413c5972676295862797a46f9070f81691d80e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 23:32:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Move VCOINCELL to be the last element of mc13892_regulators array In include/linux/mfd/mc13892.h, we define MC13892_VCOINCELL as 23. Thus VCOINCELL should be defined as 23th element in mc13892_regulators array, not the first one. This actually fixes an off-by-one bug while accessing mc13892_regulators array. For example, In mc13892_regulator_probe, we use MC13892_VCAM as array index of mc13892_regulators array. mc13892_regulators[MC13892_VCAM].desc.ops->set_mode = mc13892_vcam_set_mode; Currently, it access mc13892_regulators[12] ,which is VAUDIO not VCAM. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood --- drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c index 1b8f7398a4a8..ba909cb0d2b8 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/mc13892-regulator.c @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static struct regulator_ops mc13892_sw_regulator_ops; mc13xxx_regulator_ops) static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = { - MC13892_DEFINE_REGU(VCOINCELL, POWERCTL0, POWERCTL0, mc13892_vcoincell), MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW1, SWITCHERS0, SWITCHERS0, mc13892_sw1), MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW2, SWITCHERS1, SWITCHERS1, mc13892_sw), MC13892_SW_DEFINE(SW3, SWITCHERS2, SWITCHERS2, mc13892_sw), @@ -293,6 +292,7 @@ static struct mc13xxx_regulator mc13892_regulators[] = { MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(GPO4, POWERMISC, mc13892_gpo), MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(PWGT1SPI, POWERMISC, mc13892_pwgtdrv), MC13892_GPO_DEFINE(PWGT2SPI, POWERMISC, mc13892_pwgtdrv), + MC13892_DEFINE_REGU(VCOINCELL, POWERCTL0, POWERCTL0, mc13892_vcoincell), }; static int mc13892_powermisc_rmw(struct mc13xxx_regulator_priv *priv, u32 mask, -- 2.34.1