From bad49d9c89d8755a1289d68e6d0127a6ee79e119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:13:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: check PageUnevictable in lru_deactivate_fn()

The lru_deactivate_fn should not move page which in on unevictable lru
into inactive list.  Otherwise, we can meet BUG when we use
isolate_lru_pages as __isolate_lru_page could return -EINVAL.

Reported-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Tested-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/swap.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index a448db377cb0..5602f1a1b1e7 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -396,6 +396,9 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, void *arg)
 	if (!PageLRU(page))
 		return;
 
+	if (PageUnevictable(page))
+		return;
+
 	/* Some processes are using the page */
 	if (page_mapped(page))
 		return;
-- 
2.34.1