From bc8a309e88a86205fc3e17f06e42a2e56fc6f807 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Weston Andros Adamson Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 11:00:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] nfs: fix nonblocking calls to nfs_page_group_lock nfs_page_group_lock was calling wait_on_bit_lock even when told not to block. Fix by first trying test_and_set_bit, followed by wait_on_bit_lock if and only if blocking is allowed. Return -EAGAIN if nonblocking and the test_and_set of the bit was already locked. Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson Reviewed-by: Peng Tao Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/pagelist.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c index 7efa61586bc4..89d5d433e351 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c +++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c @@ -143,23 +143,28 @@ nfs_iocounter_wait(struct nfs_io_counter *c) * * this lock must be held if modifying the page group list * - * returns result from wait_on_bit_lock: 0 on success, < 0 on error + * return 0 on success, < 0 on error: -EDELAY if nonblocking or the + * result from wait_on_bit_lock + * + * NOTE: calling with nonblock=false should always have set the + * lock bit (see fs/buffer.c and other uses of wait_on_bit_lock + * with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE), so there is no need to check the result. */ int nfs_page_group_lock(struct nfs_page *req, bool nonblock) { struct nfs_page *head = req->wb_head; - int ret; WARN_ON_ONCE(head != head->wb_head); - do { - ret = wait_on_bit_lock(&head->wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - } while (!nonblock && ret != 0); + if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_HEADLOCK, &head->wb_flags)) + return 0; - WARN_ON_ONCE(ret > 0); - return ret; + if (!nonblock) + return wait_on_bit_lock(&head->wb_flags, PG_HEADLOCK, + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + + return -EAGAIN; } /* -- 2.34.1