From bce7560d4946dcfc07b0217b1d3862ed60ff7188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:13:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f_mode values
in setlk handlers
Move this check into flock64_to_posix_lock instead of duplicating it in
two places. This also fixes a minor wart in the code where we continue
referring to the struct flock after converting it to struct file_lock.
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
fs/locks.c | 46 ++++++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index b49e853a9c7b..4cd25781b0a4 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -388,6 +388,18 @@ static int flock64_to_posix_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl,
fl->fl_ops = NULL;
fl->fl_lmops = NULL;
+ /* Ensure that fl->fl_filp has compatible f_mode */
+ switch (l->l_type) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ }
+
return assign_type(fl, l->l_type);
}
@@ -2025,23 +2037,6 @@ again:
file_lock->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
}
- error = -EBADF;
- switch (flock.l_type) {
- case F_RDLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
- goto out;
- break;
- case F_WRLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
- goto out;
- break;
- case F_UNLCK:
- break;
- default:
- error = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock);
/*
@@ -2143,23 +2138,6 @@ again:
file_lock->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
}
- error = -EBADF;
- switch (flock.l_type) {
- case F_RDLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
- goto out;
- break;
- case F_WRLCK:
- if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
- goto out;
- break;
- case F_UNLCK:
- break;
- default:
- error = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock);
/*
--
2.34.1