From cb19d4c5253b2179e0bc6342c0ac2010623649a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanjoy Das Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:08:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [SCEV][NFC] Use triple-slash (///) for comment. Makes the comments for proveNoWrapByVaryingStart consistent with the rest of ScalarEvolution.h git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h index d47cab829ce..a4ad5573d80 100644 --- a/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h +++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h @@ -569,11 +569,12 @@ namespace llvm { /// pointer. bool checkValidity(const SCEV *S) const; - // Return true if `ExtendOpTy`({`Start`,+,`Step`}) can be proved to be equal - // to {`ExtendOpTy`(`Start`),+,`ExtendOpTy`(`Step`)}. This is equivalent to - // proving no signed (resp. unsigned) wrap in {`Start`,+,`Step`} if - // `ExtendOpTy` is `SCEVSignExtendExpr` (resp. `SCEVZeroExtendExpr`). - // + /// Return true if `ExtendOpTy`({`Start`,+,`Step`}) can be proved to be + /// equal to {`ExtendOpTy`(`Start`),+,`ExtendOpTy`(`Step`)}. This is + /// equivalent to proving no signed (resp. unsigned) wrap in + /// {`Start`,+,`Step`} if `ExtendOpTy` is `SCEVSignExtendExpr` + /// (resp. `SCEVZeroExtendExpr`). + /// template bool proveNoWrapByVaryingStart(const SCEV *Start, const SCEV *Step, const Loop *L); -- 2.34.1