From cd74c86bdf705f824d494a2bbda393d1d562b40a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Mackerras Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:44:32 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant: arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart': arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow(). [ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger ] Reported-by: Sachin Sant Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras Cc: Markus Metzger Cc: David S. Miller Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 +-- arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 +-- include/linux/perf_counter.h | 17 ----------------- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c index 7ceefaf3a7f5..5ccf9bca96c0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val, */ if (record) { struct perf_sample_data data = { - .regs = regs, .addr = 0, .period = counter->hw.last_period, }; @@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val, if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR) perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr); - if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) { + if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) { /* * Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them * by setting the counter to 0, so it will be diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c index 09de4035eaa9..b1265ce8a053 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, regs = args->regs; - data.regs = regs; data.addr = 0; cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters); @@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx)) continue; - if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data)) + if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs)) sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx); } diff --git a/include/linux/perf_counter.h b/include/linux/perf_counter.h index bd341007c4fc..740caad09a44 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_counter.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_counter.h @@ -849,23 +849,6 @@ static inline void perf_counter_comm(struct task_struct *tsk) { } static inline void perf_counter_fork(struct task_struct *tsk) { } static inline void perf_counter_init(void) { } -static inline int -perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle, struct perf_counter *c, - unsigned int size, int nmi, int sample) { } -static inline void perf_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle) { } -static inline void -perf_output_copy(struct perf_output_handle *handle, - const void *buf, unsigned int len) { } -static inline void -perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle, - struct perf_event_header *header, - struct perf_sample_data *data, - struct perf_counter *counter) { } -static inline void -perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header, - struct perf_sample_data *data, - struct perf_counter *counter, - struct pt_regs *regs) { } #endif #define perf_output_put(handle, x) \ -- 2.34.1