From cf7f8690e864c6fe11e77202dd847fa60f483418 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sripathi Kodi Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:57:14 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] sched, lockdep: inline double_unlock_balance() We have a test case which measures the variation in the amount of time needed to perform a fixed amount of work on the preempt_rt kernel. We started seeing deterioration in it's performance recently. The test should never take more than 10 microseconds, but we started 5-10% failure rate. Using elimination method, we traced the problem to commit 1b12bbc747560ea68bcc132c3d05699e52271da0 (lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueues). When LOCKDEP is disabled, this patch only adds an additional function call to double_unlock_balance(). Hence I inlined double_unlock_balance() and the problem went away. Here is a patch to make this change. Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched.c | 2 +- kernel/sched_rt.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index e8819bc6f462..ad10d0aae1d7 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -2825,7 +2825,7 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest) return ret; } -static void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest) +static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest) __releases(busiest->lock) { spin_unlock(&busiest->lock); diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index c7963d5d0625..2bdd44423599 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) #define RT_MAX_TRIES 3 static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest); -static void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest); +static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, + struct rq *busiest); static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep); -- 2.34.1