From d6d88bae97d2e1c44ef9e2ae3f22de82fa6e11c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:09:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sparc64: Kill __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW As Peter Z. explained at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/12/268 it's not needed at all and I even tested it back then. This patch just got lost in the shuffle for some reason. Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h index cce72ce4c334..4c3f7f01c709 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ #include #include -/* Don't hold the runqueue lock over context switch */ -#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW - /* The sparc has no problems with write protection */ #define wp_works_ok 1 #define wp_works_ok__is_a_macro /* for versions in ksyms.c */ -- 2.34.1